Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26496035›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2015

Cancer stem cell targeted therapy: progress amid controversies.

Tao Wang, Sarah Shigdar, Michael P Gantier, Yingchun Hou, Li Wang, Yong Li, Hadi Al Shamaileh, Wang Yin, Shu-Feng Zhou, Xinhan Zhao and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Hsa_circRNA_0101125 Promotes Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via miR-143-3p/ZNF148 Axis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endometrial Cancer Stem Cells: Where Do We Stand and Where Should We Go?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tao WangSchool of Nursing, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Sarah ShigdarSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
Michael P GantierCentre for Cancer Research, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Yingchun HouCo-Innovation Center for Qinba Region's Sustainable Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Li WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yong LiCancer Care Centre, St George Hospital and St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Kensington, Australia.
Hadi Al ShamailehSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
Wang YinSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.
Shu-Feng ZhouDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Xinhan ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, China.
Wei DuanSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cancer stem cells have been well characterized in numerous malignancies, the fundamental characteristics of this group of cells, however, have been challenged by some recent observations: cancer stem cells may not necessary to be rare within tumors; cancer stem cells and non-cancer stem cells may undergo reversible phenotypic changes; and the cancer stem cells phenotype can vary substantially between patients. Here the current status and progresses of cancer stem cells theory is illustrated and via providing a panoramic view of cancer therapy, we addressed the recent controversies regarding the feasibility of cancer stem cells targeted anti-cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCell DeathCell ProliferationDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsPhenotypeSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumoranti-cancer treatmentcancercancer stem cellcancer stem cell markercancer stem cell model

Identifiers

PMID26496035
PMCPMC4792551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.