Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26495848›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Virus Satellites Drive Viral Evolution and Ecology.

Belén Frígols, Nuria Quiles-Puchalt, Ignacio Mir-Sanchis, Jorge Donderis, Santiago F Elena, Angus Buckling, Richard P Novick, Alberto Marina, José R Penadés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Is dUTPase Enzymatic Activity Truly Essential for Viability?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Capsid redirection mechanism of thePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Genetics, ecology and evolution of phage satellites.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Open questions in the social lives of viruses.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Examination ofViruses · 2021
    Article
  17. DominanteLife · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Belén FrígolsUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, Moncada, Spain.
Nuria Quiles-PuchaltInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ignacio Mir-SanchisUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, Moncada, Spain.
Jorge DonderisInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Santiago F ElenaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (CSIC-UPV), Valencia, Spain; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America.
Angus BucklingDepartment of Biosciences, Center for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, United Kingdom.
Richard P NovickSkirball Institute Program in Molecular Pathogenesis and Departments of Microbiology and Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Alberto MarinaInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
José R PenadésInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia · ESUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ESUniversity of Glasgow · GBSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Molecular Biology of TSST-1 and other superantigen toxinsR01AI022159 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NOVICK, RICHARD P. · 1985 to 2014
$2.6M
Medical Research Council MR/M003876/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI022159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virus satellites are widespread subcellular entities, present both in eukaryotic and in prokaryotic cells. Their modus vivendi involves parasitism of the life cycle of their inducing helper viruses, which assures their transmission to a new host. However, the evolutionary and ecological implications of satellites on helper viruses remain unclear. Here, using staphylococcal pathogenicity islands (SaPIs) as a model of virus satellites, we experimentally show that helper viruses rapidly evolve resistance to their virus satellites, preventing SaPI proliferation, and SaPIs in turn can readily evolve to overcome phage resistance. Genomic analyses of both these experimentally evolved strains as well as naturally occurring bacteriophages suggest that the SaPIs drive the coexistence of multiple alleles of the phage-coded SaPI inducing genes, as well as sometimes selecting for the absence of the SaPI depressing genes. We report similar (accidental) evolution of resistance to SaPIs in laboratory phages used for Staphylococcus aureus typing and also obtain the same qualitative results in both experimental evolution and phylogenetic studies of Enterococcus faecalis phages and their satellites viruses. In summary, our results suggest that helper and satellite viruses undergo rapid coevolution, which is likely to play a key role in the evolution and ecology of the viruses as well as their prokaryotic hosts.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBacteriophagesDNA ReplicationGenomic IslandsHelper VirusesPhylogenySatellite VirusesStaphylococcus aureusViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26495848
PMCPMC4619825
OpenAlexW2139509403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.