Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26495372›Full record

ArticleEmergency (Tehran, Iran)2014

Inter-Rater Agreement of Emergency Nurses and Physicians in Emergency Severity Index (ESI) Triage.

Mehrdad Esmailian, Majid Zamani, Fatemeh Azadi, Faezeh Ghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency (Tehran, Iran), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reliability and performance of the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale used by paramedics.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Agreement between triage category and patient's perception of priority in emergency departments.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehrdad EsmailianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Majid ZamaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh AzadiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Faezeh GhasemiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTriage is one of the most important systems in patients prioritizing at the time of arrival to hospital. Based on the severity of the injury and the need for treatment, this system manages patients in the least time, which could lead to rotation of patients with high reliability and safety. Currently, the most accepted method for triage is emergency severity index (ESI) system, considered as five-level triage method, too. This method were implemented in Al Zahra Hospital of Isfahan by trained nurses since March to May 2010. This study was aimed to evaluate the accuracy of emergency nursing triage using ESI.

methodsThis prospective cross sectional study was carried out on 601 patients referred to Al-Zahra hospital of Isfahan through May 2010. The patients' triage level were determined by physicians and nurses separately and the results compared. To define the level of agreement between two groups (inter-rater agreement), the kappa index was evaluated. To specify the association between the time interval of initial triage and patient final status, Chi-Square test was applied using SPSS 18 statistical software.

resultsThere was no significant difference between results of nurses and physicians triage (P<0/0001). The agreement level (kappa index) between two groups was 94% (95% CI: 0.931-0.957). Of 601 patients, 44.1% ones were hospitalized at the emergency department, 52.6% discharged and 3.3% died. The average of time interval between nursing triage and physician visit was 9.55 minutes at the level one triage, 21.64 minutes at level two, 26.03 minutes at level three, 26.93 minutes at level four, and 11.70 minutes at level five.

conclusionIt seems that there is an acceptable inter-rater agreement between emergency nurses and physicians regarding patients' triage in terms of ESI system.

Indexed as

emergency medicinenursesphysician-nurse relationsTriage

Identifiers

PMID26495372
PMCPMC4614563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.