Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26495115›Full record

ArticleJundishapur journal of microbiology2015

In Vitro Susceptibilities of Candida albicans Isolates to Antifungal Agents in Tokat, Turkey.

Gulgun Yenisehirli, Nermin Bulut, Aydan Yenisehirli, Yunus Bulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jundishapur journal of microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Twenty-Year Course of Antifungal Resistance inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Candidemia in Brazilian neonatal intensive care units: risk factors, epidemiology, and antifungal resistance.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Evaluation ofTurk pediatri arsivi · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Susceptibility pattern ofCurrent medical mycology · 2016
    Article
  18. Comparison of clinical pharmacology of voriconazole and posaconazole.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2016
    Review
  19. Molecular identification andCurrent medical mycology · 2015
    Article
  20. Emergence of azole-resistantCurrent medical mycology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gulgun YenisehirliDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Nermin BulutDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Aydan YenisehirliDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.
Yunus BulutDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida albicans is the pathogenic species most commonly isolated from fungal infections. Management of these infections depends on the immune status of the host, severity of disease, and the choice of antifungal drug. In spite of the development of new antifungal drugs, epidemiological studies have shown that resistance to antifungal drugs in C. albicans strains is becoming a serious problem.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of C. albicans isolates to ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, and anidulafungin. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 201 C. albicans isolates were collected from clinical specimens. Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed using the Etest.

resultsAll the tested C. albicans isolates were found to be susceptible to amphotericin B and anidulafungin. Although none of the isolates showed resistance to caspofungin, 15% of the isolates were classified as showing intermediate resistance. The resistance rates of C. albicans isolates to ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole were 32%, 34%, 21%, 14% and 14%, respectively.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that resistance of C. albicans strains to azoles is more common in Tokat, Turkey. Therefore, a strategy to control the inappropriate and widespread use of antifungal drugs is urgently needed. Fungal culturing and antifungal susceptibility testing will be useful in patient management as well as resistance surveillance.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal Drug ResistanceAzolesCandida albicansEchinocandins

Identifiers

PMID26495115
PMCPMC4609313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.