Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494842›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

Strong Constraint on Human Genes Escaping X-Inactivation Is Modulated by their Expression Level and Breadth in Both Sexes.

Andrea Slavney, Leonardo Arbiza, Andrew G Clark, Alon Keinan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Sex differences in normal and malignant hematopoiesis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. When the Lyon(ized chromosome) roars: ongoing expression from an inactive X chromosome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes and autosomes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrea SlavneyDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Leonardo ArbizaDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University ak735@cornell.edu ac347@cornell.edu.
Alon KeinanDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University ak735@cornell.edu ac347@cornell.edu.

Funding

Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
The X-factor of complex disease: From population genetics to GWAS of Chromosome XR01HG006849 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G · 2013 to 2020
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006849NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG006849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eutherian mammals, X-linked gene expression is normalized between XX females and XY males through the process of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). XCI results in silencing of transcription from one ChrX homolog per female cell. However, approximately 25% of human ChrX genes escape XCI to some extent and exhibit biallelic expression in females. The evolutionary basis of this phenomenon is not entirely clear, but high sequence conservation of XCI escapers suggests that purifying selection may directly or indirectly drive XCI escape at these loci. One hypothesis is that this signal results from contributions to developmental and physiological sex differences, but presently there is limited evidence supporting this model in humans. Another potential driver of this signal is selection for high and/or broad gene expression in both sexes, which are strong predictors of reduced nucleotide substitution rates in mammalian genes. Here, we compared purifying selection and gene expression patterns of human XCI escapers with those of X-inactivated genes in both sexes. When we accounted for the functional status of each ChrX gene's Y-linked homolog (or "gametolog"), we observed that XCI escapers exhibit greater degrees of purifying selection in the human lineage than X-inactivated genes, as well as higher and broader gene expression than X-inactivated genes across tissues in both sexes. These results highlight a significant role for gene expression in both sexes in driving purifying selection on XCI escapers, and emphasize these genes' potential importance in human disease.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XGene ExpressionGenes, X-LinkedX Chromosome InactivationFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleModels, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID26494842
PMCPMC4751236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.