Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494823›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2016

Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) and Proteomics.

Lorelei D Shoemaker, Harley I Kornblum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recent Stem Cell Research on Hemorrhagic Stroke : An Update.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The roles and applications of neural stem cells in spinal cord injury repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The quest of cell surface markers for stem cell therapy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorelei D ShoemakerFrom the ‡Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Neuromolecular Innovation Program, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305;
Harley I Kornblum§NPI-Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior, Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, and of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, The Molecular Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, and The Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los, Angeles, CA 90095 HKornblum@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI028697 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KITCHEN, SCOTT G · 1991 to 2018
$39.9M
Neural Progenitor Genes and Brain TumorsR01NS052563 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KORNBLUM, HARLEY IAN · 2006 to 2015
$2.4M
Neural Progenitor Genes and Brain TumorsR56NS052563 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KORNBLUM, HARLEY IAN · 2010 to 2010
$231k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI028697NINDS NIH HHS NS052563NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052563NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS052563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) can self-renew and give rise to the major cell types of the CNS. Studies of NSCs include the investigation of primary, CNS-derived cells as well as animal and human embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived sources. NSCs provide a means with which to study normal neural development, neurodegeneration, and neurological disease and are clinically relevant sources for cellular repair to the damaged and diseased CNS. Proteomics studies of NSCs have the potential to delineate molecules and pathways critical for NSC biology and the means by which NSCs can participate in neural repair. In this review, we provide a background to NSC biology, including the means to obtain them and the caveats to these processes. We then focus on advances in the proteomic interrogation of NSCs. This includes the analysis of posttranslational modifications (PTMs); approaches to analyzing different proteomic compartments, such the secretome; as well as approaches to analyzing temporal differences in the proteome to elucidate mechanisms of differentiation. We also discuss some of the methods that will undoubtedly be useful in the investigation of NSCs but which have not yet been applied to the field. While many proteomics studies of NSCs have largely catalogued the proteome or posttranslational modifications of specific cellular states, without delving into specific functions, some have led to understandings of functional processes or identified markers that could not have been identified via other means. Many challenges remain in the field, including the precise identification and standardization of NSCs used for proteomic analyses, as well as how to translate fundamental proteomics studies to functional biology. The next level of investigation will require interdisciplinary approaches, combining the skills of those interested in the biochemistry of proteomics with those interested in modulating NSC function.

Indexed as

ProteomicsCentral Nervous SystemHumansNeural Stem CellsProtein Processing, Post-Translational

Identifiers

PMID26494823
PMCPMC4739658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.