Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494642›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Potential of MR histogram analyses for prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases.

He-Yue Liang, Ya-Qin Huang, Zhao-Xia Yang, Ying-Ding, Meng-Su Zeng, Sheng-Xiang Rao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

He-Yue LiangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ya-Qin HuangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhao-Xia YangDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ying-DingDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Meng-Su ZengDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Sheng-Xiang RaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University and Shanghai Medical Imaging Institute, No180, Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. raoxray@163.com.
Zhongshan Hospital · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histogram analyses can help predict response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases by using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST1.1) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsStandard MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (b=0, 500 s/mm(2)) was performed before chemotherapy in 53 patients with colorectal hepatic metastases. Histograms were performed for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, arterial, and portal venous phase images; thereafter, mean, percentiles (1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, 99th), skewness, kurtosis, and variance were generated. Quantitative histogram parameters were compared between responders (partial and complete response, n=15) and non-responders (progressive and stable disease, n=38). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analyses were further analyzed for the significant parameters.

resultsThe mean, 1st percentile, 10th percentile, 50th percentile, 90th percentile, 99th percentile of the ADC maps were significantly lower in responding group than that in non-responding group (p=0.000-0.002) with area under the ROC curve (AUCs) of 0.76-0.82. The histogram parameters of arterial and portal venous phase showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between the two groups.

conclusionHistogram-derived parameters for ADC maps seem to be a promising tool for predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases. KEY POINTS: • ADC histogram analyses can potentially predict chemotherapy response in colorectal liver metastases. • Lower histogram-derived parameters (mean, percentiles) for ADC tend to have good response. • MR enhancement histogram analyses are not reliable to predict response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveColorectal NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAntineoplastic AgentsADCColorectal hepatic metastasisDWI-MRIHistogram analysisResponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID26494642
OpenAlexW2190239095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.