Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494468›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2016

DNA damage-induced ephrin-B2 reverse signaling promotes chemoresistance and drives EMT in colorectal carcinoma harboring mutant p53.

S K Alam, V K Yadav, S Bajaj, A Datta, S K Dutta, M Bhattacharyya, S Bhattacharya, S Debnath, S Roy, L A Boardman and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

S K AlamCancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorder Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
V K YadavG.N.R. Knowledge Centre for Genome Informatics, Proteomics and Structural Biology Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mall Road, Delhi, India.
S BajajAdvanced Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Princess Margaret Hospital/The Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A DattaCancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorder Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
S K DuttaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
M BhattacharyyaStructural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
S BhattacharyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
S DebnathStructural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
S RoyStructural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
L A BoardmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
T C SmyrkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
J R MolinaDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
S ChakrabartiStructural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
S ChowdhuryG.N.R. Knowledge Centre for Genome Informatics, Proteomics and Structural Biology Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mall Road, Delhi, India.
D MukhopadhyayDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
S RoychoudhuryCancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorder Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology · INMayo Clinic · USInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INMayo Clinic in Arizona · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILTY PROGRAMP30DK084567 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GREGORY J. GORES · 2009 to 2026
$22.2M
Targeting Pancreatic Cancer Using Peptide Chemistry: From Bench to BedsideR01CA150190 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MIERKE, DALE F, MUKHOPADHYAY, DEBABRATA · 2010 to 2021
$5.7M
Time lapse to cancer: defining transition from polyp to colorectal cancer (PQ14)R01CA170357 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BOARDMAN, LISA ALLYN · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA150190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA150190NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170357NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK084567Wellcome Trust 500127/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation in the TP53 gene positively correlates with increased incidence of chemoresistance in different cancers. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of chemoresistance and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in colorectal cancer involving the gain-of-function (GOF) mutant p53/ephrin-B2 signaling axis. Bioinformatic analysis of the NCI-60 data set and subsequent hub prediction identified EFNB2 as a possible GOF mutant p53 target gene, responsible for chemoresistance. We show that the mutant p53-NF-Y complex transcriptionally upregulates EFNB2 expression in response to DNA damage. Moreover, the acetylated form of mutant p53 protein is recruited on the EFNB2 promoter and positively regulates its expression in conjunction with coactivator p300. In vitro cell line and in vivo nude mice data show that EFNB2 silencing restores chemosensitivity in mutant p53-harboring tumors. In addition, we observed high expression of EFNB2 in patients having neoadjuvant non-responder colorectal carcinoma compared with those having responder version of the disease. In the course of deciphering the drug resistance mechanism, we also show that ephrin-B2 reverse signaling induces ABCG2 expression after drug treatment that involves JNK-c-Jun signaling in mutant p53 cells. Moreover, 5-fluorouracil-induced ephrin-B2 reverse signaling promotes tumorigenesis through the Src-ERK pathway, and drives EMT via the Src-FAK pathway. We thus conclude that targeting ephrin-B2 might enhance the therapeutic potential of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic agents in mutant p53-bearing human tumors.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionAnimalsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEphrin-B2FemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationTumor Suppressor Protein p53EFNB2 protein, humanEphrin-B2TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26494468
PMCPMC4986638
OpenAlexW2192136560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.