Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494381›Full record

ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2016

Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Michael C Hout, Hayward J Godwin, Gemma Fitzsimmons, Arryn Robbins, Tamaryn Menneer, Stephen D Goldinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. SOLID-Similar object and lure image database.Behavior research methods · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael C Hout
Hayward J Godwin
Gemma Fitzsimmons
Arryn Robbins
Tamaryn Menneer
Stephen D Goldinger

Funding

Cognitive Load in the Bilingual Brain: Insights from Decoupled ReadingR01HD075800 · NICHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GOLDINGER, STEPHEN D · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075800NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075800-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search is one of the most widely studied topics in vision science, both as an independent topic of interest, and as a tool for studying attention and visual cognition. A wide literature exists that seeks to understand how people find things under varying conditions of difficulty and complexity, and in situations ranging from the mundane (e.g., looking for one's keys) to those with significant societal importance (e.g., baggage or medical screening). A primary determinant of the ease and probability of success during search are the similarity relationships that exist in the search environment, such as the similarity between the background and the target, or the likeness of the non-targets to one another. A sense of similarity is often intuitive, but it is seldom quantified directly. This presents a problem in that similarity relationships are imprecisely specified, limiting the capacity of the researcher to examine adequately their influence. In this article, we present a novel approach to overcoming this problem that combines multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analyses with behavioral and eye-tracking measurements. We propose a method whereby MDS can be repurposed to successfully quantify the similarity of experimental stimuli, thereby opening up theoretical questions in visual search and attention that cannot currently be addressed. These quantifications, in conjunction with behavioral and oculomotor measures, allow for critical observations about how similarity affects performance, information selection, and information processing. We provide a demonstration and tutorial of the approach, identify documented examples of its use, discuss how complementary computer vision methods could also be adopted, and close with a discussion of potential avenues for future application of this technique.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionEye MovementsHumansMultivariate AnalysisPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26494381
PMCPMC5523409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.