ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2016
Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.
Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- ThreatSim: A novel stimuli database of threatening and nonthreatening image pairs rated for similarity.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Similarity ratings for basic-level categories from the Nosofsky et al. (2018) database of rock images.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
- Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Review
- Facial expressions can be categorized along the upper-lower facial axis, from a perceptual perspective.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Role of dopamine and gray matter density in aging effects and individual differences of functional connectomes.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Mid-Air Tactile Sensations Evoked by Laser-Induced Plasma: A Neurophysiological Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- The detail is in the difficulty: Challenging search facilitates rich incidental object encoding.Memory & cognition · 2020Article
- Flexible target templates improve visual search accuracy for faces depicting emotion.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- SOLID-Similar object and lure image database.Behavior research methods · 2020Article
- Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.Current opinion in psychology · 2019Review
- Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual search is one of the most widely studied topics in vision science, both as an independent topic of interest, and as a tool for studying attention and visual cognition. A wide literature exists that seeks to understand how people find things under varying conditions of difficulty and complexity, and in situations ranging from the mundane (e.g., looking for one's keys) to those with significant societal importance (e.g., baggage or medical screening). A primary determinant of the ease and probability of success during search are the similarity relationships that exist in the search environment, such as the similarity between the background and the target, or the likeness of the non-targets to one another. A sense of similarity is often intuitive, but it is seldom quantified directly. This presents a problem in that similarity relationships are imprecisely specified, limiting the capacity of the researcher to examine adequately their influence. In this article, we present a novel approach to overcoming this problem that combines multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analyses with behavioral and eye-tracking measurements. We propose a method whereby MDS can be repurposed to successfully quantify the similarity of experimental stimuli, thereby opening up theoretical questions in visual search and attention that cannot currently be addressed. These quantifications, in conjunction with behavioral and oculomotor measures, allow for critical observations about how similarity affects performance, information selection, and information processing. We provide a demonstration and tutorial of the approach, identify documented examples of its use, discuss how complementary computer vision methods could also be adopted, and close with a discussion of potential avenues for future application of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.