ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2016
Interpreting functional effects of coding variants: challenges in proteome-scale prediction, annotation and assessment.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 20 Bp Indel ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Multiplexed food-borne pathogen detection using an argonaute-mediated digital sensor based on a magnetic-bead-assisted imaging transcoding system.Nature food · 2025Article
- DeepAnnotation: A novel interpretable deep learning-based genomic selection model that integrates comprehensive functional annotations.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Meta-EA: a gene-specific combination of available computational tools for predicting missense variant effects.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genome resequencing and genome-wide polymorphisms in mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from south India.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Severity Ranking of Missense and Frameshift Genetic Variants in SCD1 by In Silico and In Vitro Functional Analysis.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Prioritizing genomic variants through neuro-symbolic, knowledge-enhanced learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- From function to translation: Decoding genetic susceptibility to human diseases via artificial intelligence.Cell genomics · 2023Review
- Phenotypes associated with genetic determinants of type I interferon regulation in the UK Biobank: a protocol.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- miRMut: Annotation of mutations in miRNA genes from human whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- StarGazer: A Hybrid Intelligence Platform for Drug Target Prioritization and Digital Drug Repositioning Using Streamlit.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A method for scoring the cell type-specific impacts of noncoding variants in personal genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- parSMURF, a high-performance computing tool for the genome-wide detection of pathogenic variants.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Biocuration: Distilling data into knowledge.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Editorial: Improving Neuropharmacology using Big Data, Machine Learning and Computational Algorithms.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Article
- VCF.Filter: interactive prioritization of disease-linked genetic variants from sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Accurately annotate compound effects of genetic variants using a context-sensitive framework.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of genetic variation in human DNA sequencing studies remains a nontrivial challenge in clinical genomics and genome informatics. Ascribing functional roles and/or clinical significances to single nucleotide variants identified from a next-generation sequencing study is an important step in genome interpretation. Experimental characterization of all the observed functional variants is yet impractical; thus, the prediction of functional and/or regulatory impacts of the various mutations using in silico approaches is an important step toward the identification of functionally significant or clinically actionable variants. The relationships between genotypes and the expressed phenotypes are multilayered and biologically complex; such relationships present numerous challenges and at the same time offer various opportunities for the design of in silico variant assessment strategies. Over the past decade, many bioinformatics algorithms have been developed to predict functional consequences of single nucleotide variants in the protein coding regions. In this review, we provide an overview of the bioinformatics resources for the prediction, annotation and visualization of coding single nucleotide variants. We discuss the currently available approaches and major challenges from the perspective of protein sequence, structure, function and interactions that require consideration when interpreting the impact of putatively functional variants. We also discuss the relevance of incorporating integrated workflows for predicting the biomedical impact of the functionally important variations encoded in a genome, exome or transcriptome. Finally, we propose a framework to classify variant assessment approaches and strategies for incorporation of variant assessment within electronic health records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.