Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494241›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle.

R John Wallace, John A Rooke, Nest McKain, Carol-Anne Duthie, Jimmy J Hyslop, David W Ross, Anthony Waterhouse, Mick Watson, Rainer Roehe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
59.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 412 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Can seaweed mitigate methane from cows on a global scale?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. From Composition to Function: Lime Essential Oil (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. In Vitro Evaluation of Spearmint Essential Oil (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R John WallaceRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB, UK. john.wallace@abdn.ac.uk.
John A RookeSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. John.Rooke@sruc.ac.uk.
Nest McKainRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB21 9SB, UK. n.mckain@abdn.ac.uk.
Carol-Anne DuthieSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. Carol-Anne.Duthie@sruc.ac.uk.
Jimmy J HyslopSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. Jimmy.Hyslop@sac.co.uk.
David W RossSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. Dave.Ross@sruc.ac.uk.
Anthony WaterhouseSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. Tony.Waterhouse@sruc.ac.uk.
Mick WatsonEdinburgh Genomics, The Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, UK. mick.watson@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Rainer RoeheSRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. rainer.roehe@sruc.ac.uk.
Scotland's Rural College · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004235/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004243/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05191132Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211553Medical Research Council G0900740Medical Research Council MR/K001744/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethane represents 16 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. It has been estimated that ruminant livestock produce ca. 29 % of this methane. As individual animals produce consistently different quantities of methane, understanding the basis for these differences may lead to new opportunities for mitigating ruminal methane emissions. Metagenomics is a powerful new tool for understanding the composition and function of complex microbial communities. Here we have applied metagenomics to the rumen microbial community to identify differences in the microbiota and metagenome that lead to high- and low-methane-emitting cattle phenotypes.

methodsFour pairs of beef cattle were selected for extreme high and low methane emissions from 72 animals, matched for breed (Aberdeen-Angus or Limousin cross) and diet (high or medium concentrate). Community analysis was carried out by qPCR of 16S and 18S rRNA genes and by alignment of Illumina HiSeq reads to the GREENGENES database. Total genomic reads were aligned to the KEGG genes databasefor functional analysis.

resultsDeep sequencing produced on average 11.3 Gb per sample. 16S rRNA gene abundances indicated that archaea, predominantly Methanobrevibacter, were 2.5× more numerous (P = 0.026) in high emitters, whereas among bacteria Proteobacteria, predominantly Succinivibrionaceae, were 4-fold less abundant (2.7 vs. 11.2 %; P = 0.002). KEGG analysis revealed that archaeal genes leading directly or indirectly to methane production were 2.7-fold more abundant in high emitters. Genes less abundant in high emitters included acetate kinase, electron transport complex proteins RnfC and RnfD and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase. Sequence data were assembled de novo and over 1.5 million proteins were annotated on the subsequent metagenome scaffolds. Less than half of the predicted genes matched matched a domain within Pfam. Amongst 2774 identified proteins of the 20 KEGG orthologues that correlated with methane emissions, only 16 showed 100 % identity with a publicly available protein sequence.

conclusionsThe abundance of archaeal genes in ruminal digesta correlated strongly with differing methane emissions from individual animals, a finding useful for genetic screening purposes. Lower emissions were accompanied by higher Succinovibrionaceae abundance and changes in acetate and hydrogen production leading to less methanogenesis, as similarly postulated for Australian macropods. Large numbers of predicted protein sequences differed between high- and low-methane-emitting cattle. Ninety-nine percent were unknown, indicating a fertile area for future exploitation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArchaeaAustraliaBacteriaCattleMetagenomeMetagenomicsMethaneMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenMethaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26494241
PMCPMC4619255
OpenAlexW2164748414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.