Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26494187›Full record

ArticleVision research2015

Directionality of individual cone photoreceptors in the parafoveal region.

Hugh J Morris, Leonardo Blanco, Johanan L Codona, Simone L Li, Stacey S Choi, Nathan Doble

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Macular Anatomy Differs in Dyslexic Subjects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differential detection of retinal directionality.Biomedical optics express · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hugh J MorrisCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: morris.1085@osu.edu.
Leonardo BlancoCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: blanco.leonardo@gmail.com.
Johanan L CodonaSteward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. Electronic address: jlcodona@gmail.com.
Simone L LiLaboratory of Visual and Ocular Motor Physiology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH 44224, USA. Electronic address: lli@chmca.org.
Stacey S ChoiCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: choi.1080@osu.edu.
Nathan DobleCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, 338 West Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: doble.2@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · USAkron Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

In-vivo, High Contrast Imaging of the Human Rod Photoreceptor MosaicR01EY020901 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DOBLE, NATHAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY020901NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pointing direction of cone photoreceptors can be inferred from the Stiles-Crawford Effect of the First Kind (SCE-I) measurement. Healthy retinas have tightly packed cones with a SCE-I function peak either centered in the pupil or with a slight nasal bias. Various retinal pathologies can change the profile of the SCE-I function implying that the arrangement or the light capturing properties of the cone photoreceptors are affected. Measuring the SCE-I may reveal early signs of photoreceptor change before actual cell apoptosis occurs. In vivo retinal imaging with adaptive optics (AO) was used to measure the pointing direction of individual cones at eight retinal locations in four control human subjects. Retinal images were acquired by translating an aperture in the light delivery arm through 19 different locations across a subject's entrance pupil. Angular tuning properties of individual cones were calculated by fitting a Gaussian to the reflected intensity profile of each cone projected onto the pupil. Results were compared to those from an accepted psychophysical SCE-I measurement technique. The maximal difference in cone directionality of an ensemble of cones, ρ¯, between the major and minor axes of the Gaussian fit was 0.05 versus 0.29mm(-2) in one subject. All four subjects were found to have a mean nasal bias of 0.81mm with a standard deviation of ±0.30mm in the peak position at all retinal locations with mean ρ¯ value decreasing by 23% with increasing retinal eccentricity. Results show that cones in the parafoveal region converge towards the center of the pupillary aperture, confirming the anterior pointing alignment hypothesis.

Indexed as

LightAdultFemaleFovea CentralisHumansMaleMydriaticsPupilRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsVision, OcularYoung AdultMydriaticsAdaptive opticsCone photoreceptorsIn vivo retinal imagingOptical Stiles–Crawford EffectRetinaStiles–Crawford Effect of the First Kind

Identifiers

PMID26494187
PMCPMC4704462
OpenAlexW2101143086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.