ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2016
Photodynamic therapy of human lung cancer xenografts in mice.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photodynamic Therapy in Combination with Doxorubicin Is Superior to Monotherapy for the Treatment of Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Subcutaneous Xenograft Models for Studying PDT In Vivo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Measurement of Cyanine Dye Photobleaching in Photosensitizer Cyanine Dye Conjugates Could Help in Optimizing Light Dosimetry for Improved Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- High Aspect Ratio Nanotubes Formed by Tobacco Mosaic Virus for Delivery of Photodynamic Agents Targeting Melanoma.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need to develop novel therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Photodynamic therapy has been used successfully for endobronchial palliation of NSCLC, and its role in early stages of disease is being explored. We hypothesized that a novel photosensitizer, PS1, would be more effective than the standard agent, porfimer sodium (Photofrin or PFII), in treating human lung cancer xenografts in mice. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatient-derived NSCLC xenografts were established subcutaneously in severe combined immune deficiency mice. Two groups of five mice were injected with PS1 (3-[1'-m-iodobenzyloxy]ethyl-3-devinylpyropheophorbide-a), a chlorophyll-a derivative, or PFII (a purified version of hematoporphyrin derivative) and then treated with nonthermal laser light. Four mice were treated with laser light without photosensitizer and six mice received no treatment at all. All mice were then observed for tumor growth. The tumor growth end point, time-to-1000 mm(3), was evaluated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test. Tumor hematoxylin and eosin and caspase 3 staining was done to evaluate necrosis and apoptosis.
resultsThe median time-to-1000 mm(3) was 12, 12, 26, and 52 d for the control, light only, PFII, and PS1 groups. There was a significant association between the tumor growth end point and treatment (P < 0.05). Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed <1%, 0%, 67%, and 80% necrosis, and caspase 3 positivity was 2%, <1%, 17%, and 39%, respectively, in the same four groups.
conclusionsThe mice treated with PS1 exhibited a longer time for tumor regrowth and showed more tumor necrosis and apoptosis compared with the other treatment groups. Thus, the novel photosensitizer, PS1, was demonstrated to be more effective than porfimer sodium in this preclinical pilot study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.