Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26493766›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2015

Complement, a target for therapy in inflammatory and degenerative diseases.

B Paul Morgan, Claire L Harris

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 419 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Macrolide resistance trajectories across threeFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B Paul MorganInstitute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Claire L HarrisInstitute of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complement system is a key innate immune defence against infection and an important driver of inflammation; however, these very properties can also cause harm. Inappropriate or uncontrolled activation of complement can cause local and/or systemic inflammation, tissue damage and disease. Complement provides numerous options for drug development as it is a proteolytic cascade that involves nine specific proteases, unique multimolecular activation and lytic complexes, an arsenal of natural inhibitors, and numerous receptors that bind to activation fragments. Drug design is facilitated by the increasingly detailed structural understanding of the molecules involved in the complement system. Only two anti-complement drugs are currently on the market, but many more are being developed for diseases that include infectious, inflammatory, degenerative, traumatic and neoplastic disorders. In this Review, we describe the history, current landscape and future directions for anti-complement therapies.

Indexed as

Complement ActivationComplement Inactivating AgentsInflammationClinical Trials as TopicComplement System ProteinsHumansComplement Inactivating AgentsComplement System Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26493766
PMCPMC7098197
OpenAlexW2298789261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.