Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26493615›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2016

One Health approach to controlling a Q fever outbreak on an Australian goat farm.

K A Bond, G Vincent, C R Wilks, L Franklin, B Sutton, J Stenos, R Cowan, K Lim, E Athan, O Harris and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Detection and Characterisation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A systematic review of global Q fever outbreaks.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  17. Seroprevalence ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K A BondCommunicable Disease Prevention and Control,Department of Health,Victoria,Australia.
G VincentThe Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory,Australia.
C R WilksAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health,Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Australia.
L FranklinCommunicable Diseases Epidemiology and Surveillance,Department of Health,Victoria,Australia.
B SuttonCommunicable Disease Prevention and Control,Department of Health,Victoria,Australia.
J StenosThe Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory,Australia.
R CowanDepartment of Infectious Diseases,Barwon Health,Australia.
K LimDepartment of Infectious Diseases,Barwon Health,Australia.
E AthanDepartment of Infectious Diseases,Barwon Health,Australia.
O HarrisSt John of God Pathcare,Geelong,Australia.
L Macfarlane-BerryOffice of the Chief Veterinary Officer,Department of Environment and Primary Industries,Victoria,Australia.
Y SegalOffice of the Chief Veterinary Officer,Department of Environment and Primary Industries,Victoria,Australia.
S M FirestoneAsia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health,Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Australia.
Barwon Health · AUGovernment of Western Australia Department of Health · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUSt John of God Geelong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent outbreak of Q fever was linked to an intensive goat and sheep dairy farm in Victoria, Australia, 2012-2014. Seventeen employees and one family member were confirmed with Q fever over a 28-month period, including two culture-positive cases. The outbreak investigation and management involved a One Health approach with representation from human, animal, environmental and public health. Seroprevalence in non-pregnant milking goats was 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7-27]; active infection was confirmed by positive quantitative PCR on several animal specimens. Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii DNA obtained from goat and human specimens was identical by two typing methods. A number of farming practices probably contributed to the outbreak, with similar precipitating factors to the Netherlands outbreak, 2007-2012. Compared to workers in a high-efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA) filtered factory, administrative staff in an unfiltered adjoining office and those regularly handling goats and kids had 5·49 (95% CI 1·29-23·4) and 5·65 (95% CI 1·09-29·3) times the risk of infection, respectively; suggesting factory workers were protected from windborne spread of organisms. Reduction in the incidence of human cases was achieved through an intensive human vaccination programme plus environmental and biosecurity interventions. Subsequent non-occupational acquisition of Q fever in the spouse of an employee, indicates that infection remains endemic in the goat herd, and remains a challenge to manage without source control.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedAgricultural Workers' DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChildCoxiella burnetiiDisease OutbreaksDNA, BacterialFarmersFemaleGenotypeGoat DiseasesGoatsDNA, BacterialPublic health emerging infectionsQ fever

Identifiers

PMID26493615
PMCPMC4825098
OpenAlexW2140736203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.