Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26493559›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

A qualitative study on health workers' and community members' perceived sources, role of information and communication on malaria treatment, prevention and control in southeast Nigeria.

Jane C Umeano-Enemuoh, Benjamim Uzochukwu, Nkoli Ezumah, Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies, Virginia Wiseman, Obinna Onwujekwe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unmasking Malaria: Microscopy and nPCR Reveal the Hidden Misdiagnosis ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane C Umeano-EnemuohDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria. chinelo.enemuo@yahoo.com.
Benjamim UzochukwuDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria. bscuzochukwu@gmil.com.
Nkoli EzumahDepartment of Sociology/Anthropology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. ezumahnk@yahoo.com.
Lindsay Mangham-JefferiesDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. lindsay.mangham-jefferies@lshtm.ac.uk.
Virginia WisemanDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. virginia.wiseman@lshtm.ac.uk.
Obinna OnwujekweHealth Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus,, Enugu, Nigeria. obinna.onwujekwe@unn.edu.ng.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been widely acknowledged that well-planned and executed communication programmes can contribute to achieving malaria prevention and treatment goals. This however requires a good understanding of current sources and roles of information used by both health workers and communities. The study aimed at determining health workers' and community members' sources, value and use of information on malaria prevention and treatment in Nigeria.

methodsQualitative data was collected from six selected communities (three urban and three rural) in Enugu state, southeast Nigeria. A total of 18 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with 179 community members and 26 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with health workers in public and private health facilities were used to collect data on where people receive treatment for malaria and access information on malaria. The FGDS and IDIs also provided data on the values, uses and effects of information and communication on malaria treatment seeking and provision of services.

resultsThe findings revealed that the major sources of information on malaria for health workers and community members were advertisements in the mass media, workshops and seminars organized by donor agencies, facility supervision, posters, other health workers, television and radio adverts. Community involvement in the design and delivery of information on malaria control was seen as a strong strategy for improving both consumer and provider knowledge. Information from the different sources catalyzed appropriate provision and consumption of malaria treatment amongst health workers and community members.

conclusionHealth workers and consumers receive information on malaria prevention and treatment from multiple sources of communication and information, which they find useful. Harnessing these information sources to encourage consistent and accurate messages around malaria prevention and treatment is a necessary first step in the design and implementation of malaria communication and behaviour change interventions and ultimately for the sustained control of malaria.

Indexed as

CommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMalariaMaleNigeriaRural Health ServicesUrban Health Services

Identifiers

PMID26493559
PMCPMC4619100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.