ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015
Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.
Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of eHealth Self-management Interventions in Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Digital Patient Portals on Health Outcomes, System Efficiency, and Patient Attitudes: Updated Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Adherence to Electronic Health Tools Among Vulnerable Groups: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Improving Medication Adherence with Two-way Short Message Service Reminders in Sickle Cell Disease and Asthma. A feasibility randomized controlled trial.Applied clinical informatics · 2017Trial
- Which Patients With Cancer Access Their Clinical Notes? A Disparities Analysis.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- The influence of patient self-efficacy on value co-creation behavior and outcomes in chronic disease management: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Identification and Classification Features of Patient Portal, A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Respectful Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Portal Usage in Pregnant People of Color.Health equity · 2025Article
- The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Review
- Clinic follow-up of orthopaedic trauma patients during and after the post-surgical global period: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Patients Managing Their Medical Data in Personal Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Real-Time Patient Portal Use Among Emergency Department Patients: An Open Results Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Observational
- Rural Access and Usage of Patient Portals: A 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Analysis.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- E-Health Practices and Technologies: A Systematic Review from 2014 to 2019.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Disparities in Kidney Stone Disease: A Scoping Review.The Journal of urology · 2021Article
- Pattern of Use of Electronic Health Record (EHR) among the Chronically Ill: A Health Information National Trend Survey (HINTS) Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Patients' Perspectives About Factors Affecting Their Use of Electronic Personal Health Records in England: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesElectronic health record (EHR) patient portals allow individuals to access their medical information with the intent of patient empowerment. However, little is known about portal use in nephrology patients. We addressed this gap by characterizing adoption of an EHR portal, assessing secular trends, and examining the association of portal adoption and BP control (<140/90 mmHg). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients seen between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at any of four university-affiliated nephrology offices who had at least one additional nephrology follow-up visit before June 30, 2013, were included. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical measurements, and office visits were abstracted from the EHR. Neighborhood median household income was obtained from the American Community Survey 2012.
resultsOf 2803 patients, 1098 (39%) accessed the portal. Over 87% of users reviewed laboratory results, 85% reviewed their medical information (e.g., medical history), 85% reviewed or altered appointments, 77% reviewed medications, 65% requested medication refills, and 31% requested medical advice from their renal provider. In adjusted models, older age, African-American race (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.39 to 0.64), Medicaid status (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.77), and lower neighborhood median household income were associated with not accessing the portal. Portal adoption increased over time (2011 versus 2010: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.75]; 2012 versus 2010: OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.44 to 2.64]). Portal adoption was correlated with BP control in patients with a diagnosis of hypertension; however, in the fully adjusted model this was somewhat attenuated and no longer statistically significant (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.24).
conclusionWhile portal adoption appears to be increasing, greater attention is needed to understand why vulnerable populations do not access it. Future research should examine barriers to the use of e-health technologies in underserved patients with CKD, interventions to address them, and their potential to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.