Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26493203›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

Comparison of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based 18F-DCFBC PET/CT to Conventional Imaging Modalities for Detection of Hormone-Naïve and Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Steven P Rowe, Katarzyna J Macura, Anthony Ciarallo, Esther Mena, Amanda Blackford, Rosa Nadal, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Mario A Eisenberger, Michael A Carducci, Ashley E Ross and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04266392 (Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Radiofluorinated PSMA Ligand), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04266392 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Radiofluorinated PSMA Ligand

TypeinterventionalSponsorStony Brook UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsProstate CancerArms[18F]-DCFPyl Ligand
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. PSMA PET/CT SUVmax as a prognostic biomarker in patients with metachronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. In vitro and in vivo Evaluation of Folic Acid Modified DOX-LoadedInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Comparative study ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Predictors ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  13. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. [Recent progress of positron radionuclide labeled small molecule inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Theranostics · 2020
    Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven P RoweThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katarzyna J MacuraThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Anthony CiaralloThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Esther MenaThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amanda BlackfordDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Rosa NadalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mario A EisenbergerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael A CarducciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ashley E RossThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Philip W KantoffDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel P HoltThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Robert F DannalsThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ronnie C MeaseThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin G PomperThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steve Y ChoThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland scho@uwhealth.org.
Johns Hopkins University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
PSMA-based Cancer Imaging AgentsR01CA134675 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2009 to 2025
$6.2M
Training for Clinician Scientists in Imaging ResearchT32EB006351 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
Small Molecule PSMA-Targeted Alpha TherapyR01CA184228 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G, ZALUTSKY, MICHAEL ROD · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
PSMA Directed Imaging of Prostate Cancer Focus on Androgen Receptor DynamicsU01CA183031 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEWEESE, THEODORE L, POMPER, MARTIN G · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA134675NCI NIH HHS CA183031NCI NIH HHS CA184228NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134675NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184228NCI NIH HHS U01 CA183031NIBIB NIH HHS EB006351NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledConventional imaging modalities (CIMs) have limited sensitivity and specificity for detection of metastatic prostate cancer. We examined the potential of a first-in-class radiofluorinated small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), to detect metastatic hormone-naïve (HNPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

methodsSeventeen patients were prospectively enrolled (9 HNPC and 8 CRPC); 16 had CIM evidence of new or progressive metastatic prostate cancer and 1 had high clinical suspicion of metastatic disease. (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT imaging was obtained with 2 successive PET scans starting at 2 h after injection. Patients were imaged with CIM at approximately the time of PET. A lesion-by-lesion analysis of PET to CIM was performed in the context of either HNPC or CRPC. The patients were followed with available clinical imaging as a reference standard to determine the true nature of identified lesions on PET and CIM.

resultsOn the lesion-by-lesion analysis, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect a larger number of lesions (592 positive with 63 equivocal) than CIM (520 positive with 61 equivocal) overall, in both HNPC and CRPC patients. (18)F-DCFBC PET detection of lymph nodes, bone lesions, and visceral lesions was superior to CIM. When intrapatient clustering effects were considered, (18)F-DCFBC PET was estimated to be positive in a large proportion of lesions that would be negative or equivocal on CIM (0.45). On follow-up, the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC PET (0.92) was superior to CIM (0.71). (18)F-DCFBC tumor uptake was increased at the later PET time point (~2.5 h after injection), with background uptake showing a decreasing trend on later PET.

conclusionPET imaging with (18)F-DCFBC, a small-molecule PSMA-targeted radiotracer, detected more lesions than CIM and promises to diagnose and stage patients with metastatic prostate cancer more accurately than current imaging methods.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, SurfaceCysteineGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTomography, X-Ray ComputedAntigens, SurfaceCysteineFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIN-(N-((S)-1,3-Dicarboxypropyl)carbamoyl)-4-(18F)fluorobenzyl-L-cysteinebone scancomputed tomographymetastatic prostate cancerpositron emission tomographyprostate-specific membrane antigen

Identifiers

PMID26493203
PMCPMC4730886
OpenAlexW2230026600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.