Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26492943›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2015

Secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke: the ASPIRE-S study.

Linda Brewer, Lisa Mellon, Patricia Hall, Eamon Dolan, Frances Horgan, Emer Shelley, Anne Hickey, David Williams, ASPIRE-S Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Post-stroke hypertension control and receipt of health care services among veterans.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda BrewerDepartment of Geriatric & Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, 9, Ireland. lindabrewer@beaumont.ie.
Lisa MellonDepartment of Psychology, RCSI, Dublin, 2, Ireland. lisamellon@rcsi.ie.
Patricia HallDepartment of Psychology, RCSI, Dublin, 2, Ireland. phalger@outlook.com.
Eamon DolanDepartment of Geriatric & Stroke Medicine, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin, 15, Ireland. eamon028@indigo.ie.
Frances HorganSchool of Physiotherapy, RCSI, Dublin, 2, Ireland. fhorgan@rcsi.ie.
Emer ShelleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, RCSI, Dublin, 2, Ireland. emershelley@rcsi.ie.
Anne HickeyDepartment of Psychology, RCSI, Dublin, 2, Ireland. ahickey@rcsi.ie.
David WilliamsDepartment of Geriatric & Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, 9, Ireland. davidwilliams@rcsi.ie.
ASPIRE-S Study Group
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEConnolly Hospital Blanchardstown · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvivors of ischaemic stroke (IS) are at high-risk for future vascular events. Comprehensive information on the adequacy of secondary prevention after IS is lacking despite the knowledge that appropriate secondary prevention improves long-term patient outcomes. ASPIRE-S (Action on Secondary Prevention Interventions and Rehabilitation in Stroke) aimed to prospectively assess secondary prevention in patients 6 months following IS.

methodsConsenting patients admitted with IS to three Dublin hospitals were recruited over 1 year, from October 2011. At 6 months post IS a comprehensive assessment was completed, modelled on the EUROASPIRE protocol for evaluation of the adequacy of secondary prevention in post-discharge cardiac patients. This assessment included measurements of blood pressure, body mass index and fasting lipid and glucose profiles. Secondary preventive medications and smoking status were also documented.

resultsThree hundred two patients (58 % male) participated, of whom 256 (85 %) were followed-up at 6 months. Mean age was 69 years (range 22-95). At follow-up, 68 % of patients had a BMI >25 kg/m(2) and 16.4 % were still smoking. Almost two-thirds (63.4 %) had a blood pressure >140/90 and 23 % had low-density-lipoprotein >2.5 mmol/L. 28 % of diabetic patients had HbA1c ≥ 7 %. Ninety seven percent of patients were on anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. Of those with atrial fibrillation, 82 % were anti-coagulated (mean INR of 2.4). Ninety-five percent were on lipid-lowering therapy and three-quarters were on anti-hypertensive therapy.

conclusionThis prospective multi-centre survey of IS patients demonstrated a high prevalence of remaining modifiable risk factors at 6 months post stroke, despite the widespread prescription of secondary preventive medications. There is scope to improve preventive measures after IS (in particular blood pressure) by incorporating evidence-based guidelines into quality assurance cycles in stroke care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionStrokeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26492943
PMCPMC4619229
OpenAlexW2168912292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.