Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26492872›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada2015

A New Image Analysis Method Based on Morphometric and Fractal Parameters for Rapid Evaluation of In Situ Mammalian Mast Cell Status.

Piper Wedman, Ahmed Aladhami, Mary Beste, Morgan K Edwards, Alena Chumanevich, John W Fuseler, Carole A Oskeritzian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Piper WedmanDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
Ahmed AladhamiDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
Mary BesteDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
Morgan K EdwardsDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
Alena ChumanevichDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
John W FuselerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.
Carole A OskeritzianDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology,University of South Carolina School of Medicine,6439 Garners Ferry Road,Columbia,South Carolina 29209,USA.

Funding

Mast Cell S1P Receptor2 in the initiation and progression of chronic inflammationR01AI095494 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI OSKERITZIAN, CAROLE A · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apart from their effector functions in allergic disorders, tissue-resident mast cells (MC) are gaining recognition as initiators of inflammatory events through their distinctive ability to secrete many bioactive molecules harbored in cytoplasmic granules. Activation triggers mediator release through a regulated exocytosis named degranulation. MC activation is still substantiated by measuring systemic levels of MC-restricted mediators. However, identifying the anatomical location of MC activation is valuable for disease diagnosis. We designed a computer-assisted morphometric method based on image analysis of methylene blue (MB)-stained normal mouse skin tissue sections that quantitates actual in situ MC activation status. We reasoned MC cytoplasm could be viewed as an object featuring unique relative mass values based on activation status. Integrated optical density and area (A) ratios were significantly different between intact and degranulated MC (p<0.001). The examination of fractal characteristics is of translational diagnostic/prognostic value in cancer and readily applied to quantify cytoskeleton morphology and vasculature. Fractal dimension (D), a measure of their comparative space filling capacity and structural density, also differed significantly between intact and degranulated MC (p<0.001). Morphometric analysis provides a reliable and reproducible method for in situ quantification of MC activation status.

Indexed as

degranulationfractal analysisin situmast cellsmorphometry

Identifiers

PMID26492872
PMCPMC10127439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.