ArticleRehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses2016
Measurement of Function Post Hip Fracture: Testing a Comprehensive Measurement Model of Physical Function.
Article in Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Responsiveness of Isokinetic Dynamometry in Patients with Osteoarthritis after Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Repeated-Measures Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Description and comparison of postoperative functioning of patients with hip fracture 2018 and 2008 at the Örebro University Hospital - a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on rehabilitating persons with cognitive impairment.Dementia (London, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasurement of physical function post hip fracture has been conceptualized using multiple different measures. PURPOSE: This study tested a comprehensive measurement model of physical function.
designThis was a descriptive secondary data analysis including 168 men and 171 women post hip fracture.
methodsUsing structural equation modeling, a measurement model of physical function which included grip strength, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and performance was tested for fit at 2 and 12 months post hip fracture, and among male and female participants. Validity of the measurement model of physical function was evaluated based on how well the model explained physical activity, exercise, and social activities post hip fracture.
findingsThe measurement model of physical function fit the data. The amount of variance the model or individual factors of the model explained varied depending on the activity.
conclusionDecisions about the ideal way in which to measure physical function should be based on outcomes considered and participants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The measurement model of physical function is a reliable and valid method to comprehensively measure physical function across the hip fracture recovery trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.