Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26492259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Investigation of Legionella Contamination in Bath Water Samples by Culture, Amoebic Co-Culture, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Methods.

Akiko Edagawa, Akio Kimura, Takako Kawabuchi-Kurata, Shinichi Adachi, Katsunori Furuhata, Hiroshi Miyamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akiko EdagawaDivision of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan. edagawa@iph.pref.osaka.jp.
Akio KimuraDivision of Planning and Coordination, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan. akkimura@iph.pref.osaka.jp.
Takako Kawabuchi-KurataDivision of Virology, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan. kurata@iph.pref.osaka.jp.
Shinichi AdachiDivision of Environment Health, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Osaka 537-0025, Japan. adachi@iph.pref.osaka.jp.
Katsunori FuruhataSchool of Life and Environmental Science, Azabu University, Kanagawa 252-5201, Japan. furuhata@azabu-u.ac.jp.
Hiroshi MiyamotoDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga 849-8501, Japan. miyamoth@cc.saga-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated Legionella contamination in bath water samples, collected from 68 bathing facilities in Japan, by culture, culture with amoebic co-culture, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and real-time qPCR with amoebic co-culture. Using the conventional culture method, Legionella pneumophila was detected in 11 samples (11/68, 16.2%). Contrary to our expectation, the culture method with the amoebic co-culture technique did not increase the detection rate of Legionella (4/68, 5.9%). In contrast, a combination of the amoebic co-culture technique followed by qPCR successfully increased the detection rate (57/68, 83.8%) compared with real-time qPCR alone (46/68, 67.6%). Using real-time qPCR after culture with amoebic co-culture, more than 10-fold higher bacterial numbers were observed in 30 samples (30/68, 44.1%) compared with the same samples without co-culture. On the other hand, higher bacterial numbers were not observed after propagation by amoebae in 32 samples (32/68, 47.1%). Legionella was not detected in the remaining six samples (6/68, 8.8%), irrespective of the method. These results suggest that application of the amoebic co-culture technique prior to real-time qPCR may be useful for the sensitive detection of Legionella from bath water samples. Furthermore, a combination of amoebic co-culture and real-time qPCR might be useful to detect viable and virulent Legionella because their ability to invade and multiply within free-living amoebae is considered to correlate with their pathogenicity for humans. This is the first report evaluating the efficacy of the amoebic co-culture technique for detecting Legionella in bath water samples.

Indexed as

Acanthamoeba castellaniiBathsCoculture TechniquesHot SpringsJapanLegionellaLegionella pneumophilaPublic FacilitiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAcanthamoebaamoebic co-culturebath waterintracellular growthLegionella

Identifiers

PMID26492259
PMCPMC4627020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.