Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26492256›Full record

ArticleMarine drugs2015

Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Algae Extracts on Bacteria Responsible of External Otitis.

Gianluca Pane, Gabriele Cacciola, Elisabetta Giacco, Gian Luigi Mariottini, Erika Coppo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antimicrobial Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Isolation ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Effectiveness ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Deciphering the Biological Activities ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gianluca PaneDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria, Università di Genova, Largo R. Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy. Gianluca.Pane@unige.it.
Gabriele CacciolaDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Genova, Largo R. Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy. gabrielecacciola@live.it.
Elisabetta GiaccoDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita (DISTAV), Università di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 5, Genova 16132, Italy. Elisabetta.Giacco@unige.it.
Gian Luigi MariottiniDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita (DISTAV), Università di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 5, Genova 16132, Italy. Gian.Luigi.Mariottini@unige.it.
Erika CoppoDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Genova, Largo R. Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy. erika.coppo@unige.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External otitis is a diffuse inflammation around the external auditory canal and auricle, which is often occurred by microbial infection. This disease is generally treated using antibiotics, but the frequent occurrence of antibiotic resistance requires the development of new antibiotic agents. In this context, unexplored bioactive natural candidates could be a chance for the production of targeted drugs provided with antimicrobial activity. In this paper, microbial pathogens were isolated from patients with external otitis using ear swabs for over one year, and the antimicrobial activity of the two methanol extracts from selected marine (Dunaliella salina) and freshwater (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) microalgae was tested on the isolated pathogens. Totally, 114 bacterial and 11 fungal strains were isolated, of which Staphylococcus spp. (28.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (24.8%) were the major pathogens. Only three Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains and 11 coagulase-negative Staphylococci showed resistance to methicillin. The two algal extracts showed interesting antimicrobial properties, which mostly inhibited the growth of isolated S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp. with MICs range of 1.4 × 10⁸ to 2.2 × 10(10) cells/mL. These results suggest that the two algae have potential as resources for the development of antimicrobial agents.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleFungiHumansMaleMicroalgaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedOtitis ExternaPlant ExtractsAnti-Infective AgentsPlant Extractsalgaeantibiotic activityantimicrobial susceptibilitybiofilmDunaliella tertiolectaexternal otitisPseudokirchneriella subcapitataPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26492256
PMCPMC4626699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.