Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26492062›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2016

Transforming the Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Promote Safety and Quality in a PICU.

Christina L Cifra, Melania M Bembea, James C Fackler, Marlene R Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perioperative Team-Based Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changing safety culture.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Six-Domain Moral Ecology Framework for Quality Leadership in Healthcare: A Conceptual Synthesis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina L Cifra1Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA. 2Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Melania M Bembea
James C Fackler
Marlene R Miller

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1TR001079NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine the effectiveness of a structured systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference in improving the process of reviewing and responding to adverse events in a PICU.

designProspective time series analysis before and after implementation of a systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference.

settingSingle tertiary referral PICU in Baltimore, MD. PATIENTS: Thirty-three patients discussed before and 31 patients after implementation of a systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference over a total of 20 morbidity and mortality conferences, from April 2013 to March 2014.

interventionsSystems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference incorporating elements of medical incident analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThere was a significant increase in meeting attendance (mean, 12 vs 31 attendees per morbidity and mortality conference; p < 0.001) after the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference was instituted. There was no significant difference in the mean number of cases suggested (4.2 vs 4.6) or discussed (3.3 vs 3.1) per morbidity and mortality conference. There was also no significant difference in the mean number of adverse events identified per morbidity and mortality conference (3.4 vs 4.3). However, there was an increase in the proportion of cases discussed using a standard case review tool, but this did not reach statistical significance (27% vs 45%; p = 0.231). Nevertheless, we observed a significant increase in the mean number of quality improvement interventions suggested (2.4 vs 5.6; p < 0.001) and implemented (1.7 vs 4.4; p < 0.001) per morbidity and mortality conference. All adverse event categories identified had corresponding interventions suggested after the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference was instituted compared with before (80% vs 100%). Intervention-to-adverse event ratios per category were also higher (mean, 0.6 vs 1.5).

conclusionsA structured systems-oriented PICU morbidity and mortality conference incorporating elements of medical incident analysis improves the process of reviewing and responding to adverse events by significantly increasing quality improvement interventions suggested and implemented. Future work would involve testing locally adapted versions of the systems-oriented morbidity and mortality conference in multiple inpatient settings.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMedical ErrorsProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementSystems Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26492062
PMCPMC4703568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.