Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491987›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2016

The role of age and executive function in auditory category learning.

Rachel Reetzke, W Todd Maddox, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Auditory Category Learning in Children With Dyslexia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The nature of non-native speech sound representations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Auditory and visual category learning in musicians and nonmusicians.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2022
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel ReetzkeDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
W Todd MaddoxDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute of Mental Health Research, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Center for Perceptual Systems, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute of Mental Health Research, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, College of Liberal Arts, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: bchandra@utexas.edu.

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
A computational neuroscience approach to frontal compensation in decision-makingR01AG043425 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SCHNYER, DAVID M, WORTHY, DARRELL A. · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory categorization is a natural and adaptive process that allows for the organization of high-dimensional, continuous acoustic information into discrete representations. Studies in the visual domain have identified a rule-based learning system that learns and reasons via a hypothesis-testing process that requires working memory and executive attention. The rule-based learning system in vision shows a protracted development, reflecting the influence of maturing prefrontal function on visual categorization. The aim of the current study was twofold: (a) to examine the developmental trajectory of rule-based auditory category learning from childhood through adolescence and into early adulthood and (b) to examine the extent to which individual differences in rule-based category learning relate to individual differences in executive function. A sample of 60 participants with normal hearing-20 children (age range=7-12years), 21 adolescents (age range=13-19years), and 19 young adults (age range=20-23years)-learned to categorize novel dynamic "ripple" sounds using trial-by-trial feedback. The spectrotemporally modulated ripple sounds are considered the auditory equivalent of the well-studied "Gabor" patches in the visual domain. Results reveal that auditory categorization accuracy improved with age, with young adults outperforming children and adolescents. Computational modeling analyses indicated that the use of the task-optimal strategy (i.e., a conjunctive rule-based learning strategy) improved with age. Notably, individual differences in executive flexibility significantly predicted auditory category learning success. The current findings demonstrate a protracted development of rule-based auditory categorization. The results further suggest that executive flexibility coupled with perceptual processes play important roles in successful rule-based auditory category learning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAttentionAuditory PerceptionChildConcept FormationExecutive FunctionFeedbackFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemory, Short-TermYoung AdultCategory learningDevelopmentExecutive functionHypothesis-testingPerceptual processesRule-based learning

Identifiers

PMID26491987
PMCPMC4666757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.