ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015
Primary palliative care in the delivery room: patients' and medical personnel's perspectives.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- End of life care in the setting of extreme prematurity - practical challenges and ethical controversies.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2023Review
- Palliative Care in the Delivery Room: Challenges and Recommendations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate circumstances of primary palliative care (PPC) in the delivery room (DR), medical personnel's experience with neonates who died under PPC in the DR and perceived sources of care-related distress in DR staff. STUDY
designRetrospective chart review of all neonates who were cared for under PPC in the DR during the years 2000-2010 at Charité University Medical Center Berlin, and structured face-to-face interviews with DR nursing staff and physicians.
resultNeonates undergoing PPC could be grouped as preterm infants at the limits of viability with a gestational age between 22 (0)/7 and 23 (6)/7 weeks (n=86, 76%) and newborn infants with complex chronic conditions (n=27, 24%). The median age of neonates at death was 59 min (interquartile range [IQR] 28-105 min). Most of DR staff did not report relevant signs of distress in dying neonates, and providing palliative care was not named as a relevant care-related source of distress by medical personnel. However, half of the participants reported on high degrees of caregiver's emotional distress in PPC situations, identifying insecurity of how to communicate with parents and to provide emotional support as the most common source of distress.
conclusionCaregiver's emotional distress primarily originates from providing support to parents and not from providing medical care to the dying newborn. Implications for future practice include the need for structured education to improve DR staff's communication and counselling skills related to parents in PPC situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.