Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491650›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2014

Arizona Alzheimer's Registry: Strategy and Outcomes of a Statewide Research Recruitment Registry.

K T Saunders, J B Langbaum, C J Holt, W Chen, N High, C Langlois, M Sabbagh, P N Tariot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dementia registries around the globe and their applications: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain health registry updates: An online longitudinal neuroscience platform.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Attitudes toward Potential Participant Registries.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K T SaundersUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J B LangbaumBanner Alzheimer's Institute Phoenix, AZ, USA ; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium Phoenix, AZ, USA.
C J HoltSaint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
W ChenUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, AZ, USA.
N HighBanner Alzheimer's Institute Phoenix, AZ, USA ; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium Phoenix, AZ, USA.
C LangloisBanner Alzheimer's Institute Phoenix, AZ, USA ; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium Phoenix, AZ, USA.
M SabbaghArizona Alzheimer's Consortium Phoenix, AZ, USA ; Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USA.
P N TariotBanner Alzheimer's Institute Phoenix, AZ, USA ; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
PET, APOE & the Preclinical Course of Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG031581 · NIA · BANNER ALZHEIMER'S INSTITUTE · PI CASELLI, RICHARD J., REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2008 to 2018
$16.6M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium (AAC) created the Arizona Alzheimer's Registry, a screening and referral process for people interested in participating in Alzheimer's disease related research. The goals of the Registry were to increase awareness of Alzheimer's disease research and accelerate enrollment into AAC research studies.

methodsParticipation was by open invitation to adults 18 and older. Those interested provided consent and completed a written questionnaire. A subset of Registrants underwent an initial telephone cognitive assessment. Referral to AAC sites was based on medical history, telephone cognitive assessment, and research interests.

resultsA total of 1257 people consented and 1182 underwent an initial cognitive screening. Earned media (38.7%) was the most effective recruitment strategy. Participants had a mean age of 68.1 (SD 10.6), 97% were Caucasian, had 15.2 (SD 2.7) mean years of education, and 60% were female. 30% reported a family history of dementia and 70% normal cognition. Inter-rater agreement between self-reported memory status and the initial telephone cognitive assessment had a kappa of 0.31-0.43. 301 were referred to AAC sites.

conclusionIThe Registry created an infrastructure and process to screen and refer a high volume of eager Registrants. These methods were found to be effective at prescreening individuals for studies, which facilitated AAC research recruitment. The established infrastructure and experiences gained from the Registry have served as the prototype for the web-based Alzheimer's Prevention Registry, a national registry focusing on Alzheimer's disease prevention research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasepreventionrecruitmentregistry

Identifiers

PMID26491650
PMCPMC4610410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.