Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491409›Full record

ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2015

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery.

Theodore John Saclarides

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04925154 (PATHOS Tradeoffs in Patient Decision Making About Rectal Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04925154 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

PATHOS Tradeoffs in Patient Decision Making About Rectal Cancer Treatment: Benefits Compared to Quality Of Life.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General HospitalRan2021 to 2028Enrolled192ConditionsPatient PreferenceArmsThe only intervention will be the information brochure that will be given after the first questionnaire.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Transanal Approach to Rectal Polyps and Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Theodore John SaclaridesLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was developed by Professor Gerhard Buess 30 years ago at the dawn of minimally invasive surgery. TEM utilizes a closed proctoscopic system whereby endoluminal surgery is accomplished with high-definition magnification, constant CO2 insufflation, and long-shafted instruments. The end result is a more precise excision and closure compared to conventional instrumentation. Virtually any benign lesion can be addressed with this technology; however, proper patient selection is paramount when using it for cancer.

Indexed as

endoluminalendoscopicrectal cancertransanal

Identifiers

PMID26491409
PMCPMC4593923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.