ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2015
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Challenges, innovations, and the road ahead.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Retrospective Cohort Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
- Review
- Experimental study of magnetic hydrogel assisted magnetic anchorguided endoscopic submucosal dissection in colonic tumors.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Self-completion method of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the Endosaber for treating colorectal neoplasms (with video).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colonic lesions: first 50 cases at a local institution.Singapore medical journal · 2019Article
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First performed in the stomach for removal of localized gastric tumors, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has evolved into a technique that is increasingly being employed to resect colorectal lesions. As opposed to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD allows the endoscopist to remove large specimens en bloc to provide accurate pathologic evaluation and lower local recurrence rates. ESD is an ideal technique for resection of lesions without lymph node metastases and is becoming the standard of care in Japan as outcomes data has proven it to be equally efficacious, less invasive, and inexpensive as compared with surgery; however, potential risk for complications is high and the procedure is currently not widely available in the Western world. As more interest, endoscopist training, and data supporting the technique's use mount, ESD will also likely become the standard of care in the Western world for resection of localized colorectal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.