Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491343›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2015

Service users' experiences and views of aggressive situations in mental health care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Camilla Buch Gudde, Turid Møller Olsø, Richard Whittington, Solfrid Vatne

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla Buch GuddeForensic Department Brøset, Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, St Olavs Hospital, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Social Work and Health Science, Faculty of Social Science and Technology Management, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Turid Møller OlsøNorwegian Resource Centre for Community Mental Health, NTNU Social Research AS, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Richard WhittingtonForensic Department Brøset, Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, St Olavs Hospital, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway ; Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Solfrid VatneInstitute of Health and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Molde University College · NONTNU Samfunnsforskning · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAggressive situations occurring within mental health services can harm service users, staff, and the therapeutic environment. There is a consensus that the aggression phenomenon is multidimensional, but the picture is still unclear concerning the complex interplay of causal variables and their respective impact. To date, only a small number of empirical studies include users' views of relevant factors. The main objective of this review is to identify and synthesize evidence relating to service users' experiences and views of aggressive situations in mental health settings.

methodsWe included qualitative studies of any design reporting on service users' own experiences of conditions contributing to aggressive situations in mental health care and their views on preventative strategies. Eligible articles were identified through an electronic database search (PsycINFO, PubMed, Ovid Nursing Database, Embase, and CINAHL), hand search, and cross-referencing. Extracted data were combined and interpreted using aspects of thematic synthesis.

resultsWe reviewed 5,566 records and included 13 studies (ten qualitative and three mixed methods). Service users recognized that both their own mental state and negative aspects of the treatment environment affected the development of aggressive situations. Themes were derived from experiential knowledge and included calls to be involved in questions regarding how to define aggression and relevant triggers, and how to prevent aggressive encounters effectively. The findings suggest that incidents are triggered when users experience staff behavior as custodial rather than caring and when they feel ignored.

conclusionThe findings highlight the importance of staffs' knowledge and skills in communication for developing relationships based on sensitivity, respect, and collaboration with service users in order to prevent aggressive situations. An important factor is a treatment environment with opportunities for meaningful activities and a preponderance of trained staff who work continuously on the development of conditions and skills for collaborative interaction with users.

Indexed as

aggressioninpatientmental healthservice user experiencesuser involvementviolence

Identifiers

PMID26491343
PMCPMC4599636
OpenAlexW1656423223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.