Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491252›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2015

Systematic review and meta-analysis: bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Qin Yin, Jingjing Li, Yujing Xia, Rong Zhang, Jianrong Wang, Wenxia Lu, Yuqing Zhou, Yuanyuan Zheng, Huerxidan Abudumijiti, Rongxia Chen and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. [Ursodeoxycholic acid combined with bezafibrate in the treatment of refractory primary biliary cholangitis: a meta-analysis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Management of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Current Treatment and Future Perspectives.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Cholestatic liver diseases: new targets, new therapies.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  13. [Advances in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [Consensus on the diagnosis and management of primary biliary cirrhosis (cholangitis)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qin YinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ; The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yujing XiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ; The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Jianrong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ; The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Wenxia LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ; The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yuqing ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China ; The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Huerxidan AbudumijitiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Rongxia ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Kan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Sainan LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tong LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fan WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jie LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yingqun ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chuanyong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimUrsodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but not all cases respond well. Evidence has shown that combination therapy of UDCA with bezafibrate significantly improved liver function. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of UDCA and bezafibrate combination therapy in the treatment of PBC.

resultsNine trials, with a total of 269 patients, were included in the analysis. The bias risk of these trials was high. Compared with UDCA alone, the combination with bezafibrate improved the Mayo risk score (mean difference [MD], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.95; P=0.0008) and liver biochemistry: alkaline phosphatase (MD, -238.21 IU/L; 95% CI, -280.83 to -195.60; P<0.00001); gamma-glutamyltransferase (MD, -38.23 IU/L; 95% CI, -50.16 to -25.85; P<0.00001); immunoglobulin M (MD, -128.63 IU/L; 95% CI, -151.55 to -105.71; P<0.00001); bilirubin (MD, -0.20 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.07; P=0.002); triglycerides (MD, -26.84 mg/dL; 95% CI, -36.51 to -17.17; P<0.0001); total cholesterol (MD, -21.58 mg/dL; 95% CI, -30.81 to -12.34; P<0.0001), and serum alanine aminotransferase (MD, -10.24 IU/L; 95% CI, -12.65 to -78.5; P<0.00001). However, combination therapy showed no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality or pruritus, and may have resulted in more adverse events (risk ratio [RR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.67; P=0.008).

conclusionCombination therapy improved liver biochemistry and the prognosis of PBC, but did not improve clinical symptoms or incidence of death. Attention should be paid to adverse events when using bezafibrate.

Indexed as

BezafibrateBiomarkersChi-Square DistributionDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLiverLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryOdds RatioRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrsodeoxycholic AcidBezafibrateBiomarkersUrsodeoxycholic Acidbezafibratemeta-analysisprimary biliary cirrhosisursodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID26491252
PMCPMC4599574
OpenAlexW2116137858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.