Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491204›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2015

Randomized, prospective assessment of moisturizer efficacy for the treatment of radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Kenji Sekiguchi, Mami Ogita, Keiko Akahane, Chiori Haga, Ryoko Ito, Satoru Arai, Yasushi Ishida, Yoichiro Tsukada, Jiro Kawamori

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji SekiguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo kenjisek@luke.ac.jp.
Mami OgitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
Keiko AkahaneDepartment of Radiology, Saitama Medical Center Jichi Medical University, Saitama.
Chiori HagaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
Ryoko ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
Satoru AraiDepartment of Dermatology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
Yasushi IshidaCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
Yoichiro TsukadaDepartment of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Jiro KawamoriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo.
St. Luke's International Hospital · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe effect of heparinoid moisturizer use after acute skin damage for patients receiving whole-breast radiotherapy after lumpectomy is understudied.

methodsA total of 30 patients were randomly assigned to receive heparinoid moisturizer (Group M), and 32 patients comprised the control group (Group C). Patients in Group M were instructed to apply heparinoid moisturizer from 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy, and to continue to use the moisturizer until 3 months after completion of whole-breast radiotherapy. Group C patients were instructed to not apply any topical moisturizer during the study period. The relative ratio of skin water content ratio (RWCR(t) = (It /Nt)/(I0/N0)) between irradiated and non-irradiated field was calculated. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. The primary endpoint was the difference in relative ratio of skin water content ratio between 2 and 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy.

resultsIn Group C, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.80 ± 0.15 at 2 weeks and maintained the low level at 4 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy. Similarly, in Group M, relative ratio of skin water content ratio dropped to 0.81 ± 0.19 at 2 weeks (prior to application), however, it returned to baseline level (1.05 ± 0.23) at 4 weeks (2 weeks after application). The arithmetic difference of relative ratio of skin water content ratio in Group M was 0.24 ± 0.23 and was significantly larger than in Group C (0.06 ± 0.15; P < 0.01). Skin dryness and desquamation were less severe in Group M.

conclusionsThe application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy significantly increased water content and helped improve skin dryness and desquamation compared with no use of moisturizer.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDermatologic AgentsEmollientsEmulsionsEpidermisFemaleHeparinoidsHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPruritusQuality of LifeRadiodermatitisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDermatologic AgentsEmollientsEmulsionsHeparinoidsbreast canceremollientsradiation dermatitisrandomized controlled trialskin hydration

Identifiers

PMID26491204
PMCPMC4653048
OpenAlexW2175315582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.