Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26491181›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Clinical and Laboratory Testing for Trichomonas vaginalis Infection.

Barbara Van Der Pol

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Manifestation and Epidemiological Finding ofIranian journal of public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Anti-parasitic activity of nanoJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Current and Future Trends in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Multiattribute Analysis ofInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2021
    Article
  20. A review onSouthern African journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara Van Der PolDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USAEmory University bvanderp@uab.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trichomonas vaginalis infection is highly prevalent in the United States and worldwide. Traditional clinical diagnostic methods fail to identify more than half of these infections that, if left untreated, can result in adverse pregnancy outcomes and an exacerbated risk of both acquisition and transmission of HIV. Women bear a disproportionate amount of the burden of these infections, and testing among populations at risk for this disease should be provided. Molecular technologies have expanded our capacity for laboratory-based detection of infection and can be used on samples already being collected for chlamydia/gonorrhea screening.

Indexed as

Global HealthHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesTrichomonas InfectionsTrichomonas vaginalis

Identifiers

PMID26491181
PMCPMC4702717
OpenAlexW2258841189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.