ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
Endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic resection for small gastric stromal tumors.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03082079 (Long Outcome of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long Outcome of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<2cm) :a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ESR-EB and ESE in the treatment of small gastric muscularis propria tumours: single-centre prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection combined with presuture for resection of a colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Endoscopic Treatment Techniques for Subepithelial Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Efficacy analysis of modified double band ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection and endoscopic mucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (≤ 1.5 cm).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Precutting Endoscopic Band Ligation-Assisted Resection Is Safe and Effective for Treating Gastric Submucosal Tumors from the Muscularis Propria.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Stomach.Gut and liver · 2023Article
- Band-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria in the gastric fundus: a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Effects of Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation With Non-Submucosal Injection on Stromal Tumors in Stomach.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Article
- Clinical evaluation of endoscopic resection for treatment of large gastric stromal tumors.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Removal of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Stomach: A Single-Center Experience.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Article
- Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Previous studies have addressed the safety and feasibility of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for the treatment of small gastric GISTs. However, published reports comparing EBL with other interventions are limited. This current study evaluates the efficacy of EBL and compares EBL to both endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic resection (LAP) for small gastric GISTs less than 15 mm.
methodsA total of 339 patients who underwent endoscopic therapy or laparoscopic resection for gastric GISTs between 1998 and 2012 were retrospectively identified and collected from medical records in our hospital. The parameters measured for each procedure type includes clinicopathological characteristics, length of stay, hospitalization expense and surgical outcomes.
resultsAmong the 147 patients included in our study, 72 (48.98 %) received EBL, 27 (18.37 %) received ESD, and 48 (32.65 %) received LAP. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients such as gender, age, tumor site and size were well balanced between the study groups. There was also no significant difference in follow-up time between the study groups. The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the patients receiving EBL than patients receiving ESD and LAP (p < 0.001). The estimated blood loss was significantly different between the three groups (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 1.39 % of the patients receiving EBL, 18.52 % of the patients receiving ESD and 4.17 % of the patients receiving LAP (p = 0.004), and recurrence rate in 15.00, 9.10 and 11.76 %, respectively (p = 0.705). There was also significant difference about mean hospital stay and hospital cost between three groups (p < 0.001).
conclusionOur results show a significant advantage in the short-term outcome for EBL compared to ESD and LAP. However, long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the three methods for the treatment of small GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.