Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490655›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2015

A phase I trial of mFOLFOX6 combined with the oral PI3K inhibitor BKM120 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

Autumn J McRee, Hanna K Sanoff, Cheryl Carlson, Anastasia Ivanova, Bert H O'Neil

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Targeted Treatment against Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway as a Target for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Autumn J McReeLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. autumn_mcree@med.unc.edu.
Hanna K SanoffLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Cheryl CarlsonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Anastasia IvanovaLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7305, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Bert H O'NeilIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

UNC Oncology K12K12CA120780 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM · 2007 to 2026
$9.6M
Use and Comparative Effectiveness of Innovative Therapies for Hepatocellular CarcK07CA160722 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANOFF, HANNA KELLY · 2011 to 2015
$851k
NCI NIH HHS 2K12CA120780-06NCI NIH HHS K07 CA160722NCI NIH HHS K07CA160722NCI NIH HHS K12 CA120780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe oral PI3K inhibitor BKM120 has been reported as safe and well tolerated in early phase clinical trials of advanced cancer patients. We performed a phase I trial of BKM120 plus mFOLFOX6 (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin), a common chemotherapeutic backbone in GI malignancies, to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the safety and tolerability of the combination.

methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors received oral BKM120 daily combined with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of a 28 day cycle. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schema.

resultsA total of 17 patients received treatment with BKM120, 13 of which were evaluate for dose limited toxicity (DLT). The most common tumor types were colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. DLT included grade 3 hyperglycemia, grade 3 AST/ALT elevation, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. A total of 76 % of patients experienced treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), the most common of which were neutropenia, fatigue, leukopenia, hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. One patient demonstrated an unconfirmed partial response and three patients had stable disease. DISCUSSION: The MTD of BKM120 in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 was 40 mg daily, which is well below the 100 mg daily dose proven effective and tolerable both as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutics. In addition, the regimen of BKM120 with mFOLFOX6 in patients with refractory solid tumors resulted in increased toxicity than would be expected from either the PI3K inhibitor or the chemotherapy backbone alone.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAdministration, OralAdultAgedAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinLeukopeniaMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesNauseaAminopyridinesFluorouracilLeucovorinMorpholinesNVP-BKM120Organoplatinum CompoundsPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors5-fluorouracilBKM120Gastrointestinal malignanciesOxaliplatinPI3K pathway

Identifiers

PMID26490655
PMCPMC5907495
OpenAlexW2175789037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.