ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2016
Comparison of the efficacy and histopathological effects of three hemostatic agents in a partial nephrectomy rat model.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The impact of preoperative fasting time on patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and analysis of risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe major complications of partial nephrectomy are bleeding and urine leakage. While various hemostatic agents are used to control bleeding, the histopathological characteristics of these hemostatic agents have not been investigated adequately. We aimed to investigate and compare the histopathological and hemostatic effects of local hemostatic agents in a partial nephrectomy rat model.
methodsThirty-two rats were divided into four equal groups, and partial nephrectomy was done to all rats. Conventional suture repair, Glubran2®, FloSeal®, and Celox™ were applied to every single group. The period of warm ischemia and hemostasis during surgical process was timed. Rats were killed later 3 weeks, and their partial nephrectomy applied kidneys were evaluated histopathologically.
resultsThe fastest hemostasis was provided with Glubran2® (32.87 s). FloSeal® was the second (40.85 s), and Celox™ was the third (55.75 s). Glomerular necrosis and calcification were seen more in the suture group than other groups (p < 0.001). Fibrosis was found significantly less in Celox™ group. Fibroblast activation was found significantly less comparing to other groups (p < 0.01). The erythrocyte aggregation was significantly greater in the Glubran2® and FloSeal® groups than suture group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001).
conclusionThe negative effects of hemostatic agents to the renal histopathology were less than conventional suture repair. Celox™ was the best biocompatible agent. In comparison with three agents, it was observed that Glubran2® provided hemostasis faster than other agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.