Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490539›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2015

Evaluation of the prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on head and neck mucosal melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Wei Li, Yalian Yu, Hailong Wang, Aihui Yan, Xuejun Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. wei.li.79@gmail.com.
Yalian YuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. yyl_hope@sina.cn.
Hailong WangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. 1059050227@qq.com.
Aihui YanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. yah567@sina.com.
Xuejun JiangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People's Republic of China. djiangxj@163.com.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare type of malignant tumor that frequently exhibits postoperative recurrence and distant metastasis. Many clinicians administer postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy to improve patient prognosis and enhance quality of life; however, the effects of this treatment remain controversial. Therefore, in this study, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the practical value of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma.

methodsArticles in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE databases were systematically retrieved. Analyses were conducted to compare the impact of treatments involving postoperative radiotherapy with treatments entailing surgery alone on patient overall survival time, local recurrence and distant metastasis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.2 and Stata/SE version 13.0 software according to the principles specified for systematic reviews of interventions in the Cochrane handbook.

resultsTwelve cohort studies involving 1593 patients satisfied the desired conditions. In comparing surgery alone with postoperative radiotherapy, there was no significant difference regarding a decrease in the death risk in HNMM patients (HR, 1.07; 95 % CI, 0.95-1.2; p = 0.903; low heterogeneity, I(2) = 0); this was also the case for sinonasal melanoma after subgroup meta-analysis (HR, 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.8-1.36; p = 0.983; low heterogeneity, I(2) = 0 %). A sensitivity analysis and subgroup meta-analysis showed that disease progression was the main source of the instability in the results. Surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy reduced the risk of local recurrence (HR, 0.51; 95 % CI, 0.35-0.76; p = 0.155) but did not reduce the risk of distant metastasis (HR, 2.26; 95 % CI, 1.01-5.05; p = 0.006).

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that for HNMM patients surgery is recommended if indicated, and surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy is also recommended for dramatically improved local control of the tumor bed. For patients not suitable for surgical treatment, radiotherapy is still advised. To control distant metastasis and finally lower the risk of death, immunological therapy is another potential option whose therapeutic effect needs to be proved with more data from clinical trials.

Indexed as

PrognosisHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMelanomaMucous MembraneNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID26490539
PMCPMC4618517
OpenAlexW2162489714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.