Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490489›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2016

18F-FDG PET/CT focal, but not osteolytic, lesions predict the progression of smoldering myeloma to active disease.

E Zamagni, C Nanni, F Gay, A Pezzi, F Patriarca, M Bellò, I Rambaldi, P Tacchetti, J Hillengass, B Gamberi and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM guidelines on the use of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Application of an artificial intelligence-based tool in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Observation Versus Control Versus Cure.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Hybrid simultaneous whole-body 2-[European radiology · 2023
    Article
  14. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

E Zamagni'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
C NanniInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
F GayMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
A Pezzi'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
F PatriarcaHematologic Clinic, Department of Clinical and Morphological Research, Udine University, Udine, Italy.
M BellòInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Imaging, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
I RambaldiInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
P Tacchetti'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
J HillengassDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
B GamberiHematology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
L Pantani'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
V MagarottoMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
A VersariInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
M OffidaniHematology Clinic, AOU Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
B Zannetti'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
F CarobolanteHematologic Clinic, Department of Clinical and Morphological Research, Udine University, Udine, Italy.
M BalmaInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Imaging, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
P MustoHematology Unit, IRCCS Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy.
M RensiInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.
K Mancuso'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
A Dimitrakopoulou-StraussDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
S ChauvièMedical Physics Department, Santa Croce and Carlo Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
S Rocchi'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
N FardDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
G Marzocchi'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
G StortoUnit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Referral Cancer Centre of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy.
P GhediniInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
A PalumboMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
S FantiInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
M Cavo'Seràgnoli' Institute of Hematology, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITHeidelberg University · DEAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata · ITUniversity of Udine · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of patient sub-groups with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) at high risk of progression to active disease (MM) is an important goal. 18F-FDG PET/CT (positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (PET/CT) using glucose labelled with the positron-emitting radionuclide (18)F) allows for assessing early skeletal involvement. Identification of osteolytic lesions by this technique has recently been incorporated into the updated International Myeloma Working Group criteria for MM diagnosis. However, no data are available regarding the impact of focal lesions (FLs) without underlying osteolysis on time to progression (TTP) to MM. We hence prospectively studied a cohort of 120 SMM patients with PET/CT. PET/CT was positive in 16% of patients (1 FL: 8, 2 FLs: 3, >3 FLs: 6, diffuse bone marrow involvement: 2). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 38% of patients progressed to MM, in a median time of 4 years, including 21% with skeletal involvement. The risk of progression of those with positive PET/CT was 3.00 (95% confidence interval 1.58-5.69, P=0.001), with a median TTP of 1.1 versus 4.5 years for PET/CT-negative patients. The probability of progression within 2 years was 58% for positive versus 33% for negative patients. In conclusion, PET/CT positivity significantly increased the risk of progression of SMM to MM. PET/CT could become a new tool to define high-risk SMM.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMultiple MyelomaOsteolysisProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID26490489
OpenAlexW2174017222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.