Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490357›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

A limited sampling strategy based on maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation for a five-probe phenotyping cocktail.

Thu Thuy Nguyen, Henri Bénech, Alain Pruvost, Natacha Lenuzza

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thu Thuy Nguyen
Henri Bénech
Alain Pruvost
Natacha Lenuzza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCocktail approach using a combination of probes to phenotype several cytochromes P450 or transporters is of high interest in anticipating drug–drug interactions and personalized medicine. Its clinical use remains however limited by the intensive sampling scheme required to obtain phenotyping indexes (PI) which consists in calculating the area under the concentration–time curves. We proposed to use maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAPBE) that incorporates available information from the whole population to derive PI from a few individual observations. The performance of a limited sampling strategy (LSS) based on MAPBE was evaluated for a five-probe cocktail.

methodsThe studied cocktail included midazolam, tolbutamide, caffeine, dextromethorphan, omeprazole and their relevant metabolites. Prior information for MAPBE was obtained by nonlinear mixed-effect modelling of data from a pilot study. Sampling times were chosen based on optimal design theory using the Bayesian Fisher information matrix. Through a simulation study, we investigated the predicted PI in terms of bias and imprecision for varying number and timing of samples.

resultsSome three-point Bayesian designs gave mean prediction errors in [−5 %, 5 %], root mean square errors below 30 % for all probes, except dextromethorphan whose model should be consolidated further with additional data. This approach gave overall less outlier predicted values than single-point metrics and was more flexible to the timing of the latest sampling.

conclusionsMAPBE is accurate for predicting simultaneously several PI while being flexible in terms of integrating clinical constraints. Therefore, LSS based on MAPBE could help reduce the time of presence in hospital for individuals to be phenotyped.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, BiologicalCaffeineComputer SimulationDextromethorphanDrug InteractionsHumansMidazolamOmeprazolePhenotypePilot ProjectsTolbutamideCaffeineDextromethorphanMidazolamOmeprazoleTolbutamide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.