ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016
A limited sampling strategy based on maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation for a five-probe phenotyping cocktail.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Mixture Dosing and Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling of Eight Environmental Contaminants in Rabbits to Improve Extrapolation Value of Toxicokinetic Data.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Omeprazole Limited Sampling Strategies to Estimate Constitutive Cytochrome P450 2C19 Activity in Healthy Adults.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCocktail approach using a combination of probes to phenotype several cytochromes P450 or transporters is of high interest in anticipating drug–drug interactions and personalized medicine. Its clinical use remains however limited by the intensive sampling scheme required to obtain phenotyping indexes (PI) which consists in calculating the area under the concentration–time curves. We proposed to use maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAPBE) that incorporates available information from the whole population to derive PI from a few individual observations. The performance of a limited sampling strategy (LSS) based on MAPBE was evaluated for a five-probe cocktail.
methodsThe studied cocktail included midazolam, tolbutamide, caffeine, dextromethorphan, omeprazole and their relevant metabolites. Prior information for MAPBE was obtained by nonlinear mixed-effect modelling of data from a pilot study. Sampling times were chosen based on optimal design theory using the Bayesian Fisher information matrix. Through a simulation study, we investigated the predicted PI in terms of bias and imprecision for varying number and timing of samples.
resultsSome three-point Bayesian designs gave mean prediction errors in [−5 %, 5 %], root mean square errors below 30 % for all probes, except dextromethorphan whose model should be consolidated further with additional data. This approach gave overall less outlier predicted values than single-point metrics and was more flexible to the timing of the latest sampling.
conclusionsMAPBE is accurate for predicting simultaneously several PI while being flexible in terms of integrating clinical constraints. Therefore, LSS based on MAPBE could help reduce the time of presence in hospital for individuals to be phenotyped.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26490357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.