Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490288›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Synchronization of motor unit firings: an epiphenomenon of firing rate characteristics not common inputs.

Joshua C Kline, Carlo J De Luca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua C KlineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and Delsys Incorporated, Natick, Massachusetts.
Carlo J De LucaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and Delsys Incorporated, Natick, Massachusetts cjd@delsys.com.

Funding

Non-invasive System for Identifying Motoneuron BehaviorR44NS077526 · NINDS · ALTEC, INC. · PI DE LUCA, GIANLUCA · 2014 to 2020
$3.5M
Non-Invasive System for Identifying Motoneuron BehaviorR43NS077526 · NINDS · ALTEC, INC. · PI DE LUCA, GIANLUCA · 2012 to 2013
$642k
NINDS NIH HHS R43NS077526NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS077526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchronous motor unit firing instances have been attributed to anatomical inputs shared by motoneurons. Yet, there is a lack of empirical evidence confirming the notion that common inputs elicit synchronization under voluntary conditions. We tested this notion by measuring synchronization between motor unit action potential trains (MUAPTs) as their firing rates progressed within a contraction from a relatively low force level to a higher one. On average, the degree of synchronization decreased as the force increased. The common input notion provides no empirically supported explanation for the observed synchronization behavior. Therefore, we investigated a more probable explanation for synchronization. Our data set of 17,546 paired MUAPTs revealed that the degree of synchronization varies as a function of two characteristics of the motor unit firing rate: the similarity and the slope as a function of force. Both are measures of the excitation of the motoneurons. As the force generated by the muscle increases, the firing rate slope decreases, and the synchronization correspondingly decreases. Different muscles have motor units with different firing rate characteristics and display different amounts of synchronization. Although this association is not proof of causality, it consistently explains our observations and strongly suggests further investigation. So viewed, synchronization is likely an epiphenomenon, subject to countless unknown neural interactions. As such, synchronous firing instances may not be the product of a specific design and may not serve a specific physiological purpose. Our explanation for synchronization has the advantage of being supported by empirical evidence, whereas the common input does not.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalYoung Adultcommon inputfiring instancesmotoneuronmotor unitsynchronization

Identifiers

PMID26490288
PMCPMC4760486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.