Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490244›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Plasmodium parasites mount an arrest response to dihydroartemisinin, as revealed by whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray study.

Philip J Shaw, Sastra Chaotheing, Pavita Kaewprommal, Jittima Piriyapongsa, Chayaphat Wongsombat, Nattida Suwannakitti, Pongpisid Koonyosying, Chairat Uthaipibull, Yongyuth Yuthavong, Sumalee Kamchonwongpaisan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance inAnnual review of microbiology · 2020
    Review
  11. A Biosynthetic Platform for Antimalarial Drug Discovery.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. From Genes to Transcripts, a Tightly Regulated Journey inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Validation ofPeerJ · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antimalarial Drug Resistance: A Threat to Malaria Elimination.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J ShawProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. philip@biotec.or.th.
Sastra ChaotheingProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Pavita KaewprommalBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Genome Technology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. pavita.kae@biotec.or.th.
Jittima PiriyapongsaBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Genome Technology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. jittima.pir@biotec.or.th.
Chayaphat WongsombatProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. chayaphat.won@biotec.or.th.
Nattida SuwannakittiProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. nattida.suw@biotec.or.th.
Pongpisid KoonyosyingProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. pongpisid.koo@biotec.or.th.
Chairat UthaipibullProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. chairat@biotec.or.th.
Yongyuth YuthavongProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. yongyuth@biotec.or.th.
Sumalee KamchonwongpaisanProtein-Ligand Engineering and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Medical Molecular Biology Research Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), 113 Thailand Science Park, Thanon Phahonyothin, Tambon Khlong Neung, Amphoe, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. sumaleek@biotec.or.th.
National Science and Technology Development Agency · THNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControl of malaria is threatened by emerging parasite resistance to artemisinin and derivative drug (ART) therapies. The molecular detail of how Plasmodium malaria parasites respond to ART and how this could contribute to resistance are not well understood. To address this question, we performed a transcriptomic study of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) response in P. falciparum K1 strain and in P. berghei ANKA strain using microarray and RNA-seq technology.

resultsMicroarray data from DHA-treated P. falciparum trophozoite stage parasites revealed a response pattern that is overall less trophozoite-like and more like the other stages of asexual development. A meta-analysis of these data with previously published data from other ART treatments revealed a set of common differentially expressed genes. Notably, ribosomal protein genes are down-regulated in response to ART. A similar pattern of trophozoite transcriptomic change was observed from RNA-seq data. RNA-seq data from DHA-treated P. falciparum rings reveal a more muted response, although there is considerable overlap of differentially expressed genes with DHA-treated trophozoites. No genes are differentially expressed in DHA-treated P. falciparum schizonts. The transcriptional response of P. berghei to DHA treatment in vivo in infected mice is similar to the P. falciparum in vitro culture ring and trophozoite responses, in which ribosomal protein genes are notably down-regulated.

conclusionsRing and trophozoite stage Plasmodium respond to ART by arresting metabolic processes such as protein synthesis and glycolysis. This response can be protective in rings, as shown by the phenomenon of dormancy. In contrast, this response is not as protective in trophozoites owing to their commitment to a highly active and vulnerable metabolic state. The lower metabolic demands of schizonts could explain why they are less sensitive and unresponsive to ART. The ART response pattern is revealed clearly from RNA-seq data, suggesting that this technology is of great utility for studying drug response in Plasmodium.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAntimalarialsArtemisininsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPlasmodiumAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimol

Identifiers

PMID26490244
PMCPMC4618149
OpenAlexW2103155671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.