Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490167›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2016

Reorganization of the interchromosomal network during keratinocyte differentiation.

Nitasha Sehgal, Brandon Seifert, Hu Ding, Zihe Chen, Branislav Stojkovic, Sambit Bhattacharya, Jinhui Xu, Ronald Berezney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Mitotic Antipairing of Homologous Chromosomes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nitasha SehgalDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Brandon SeifertDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Hu DingDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Zihe ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Branislav StojkovicDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Sambit BhattacharyaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, NC, 28301, USA.
Jinhui XuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Ronald BerezneyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA. berezney@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USFayetteville State University · US

Funding

Nuclear Matrix Structure and Genomic FunctionR01GM072131 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BEREZNEY, RONALD · 2004 to 2007
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The well-established human epidermal keratinocyte (HEK) differentiation model was investigated to determine possible alterations in chromosome territory (CT) association during differentiation. The seven human chromosomes (1, 4, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18) selected for this analysis are representative of the chromosome size and gene density range of the overall human genome as well as including a majority of genes involved in epidermal development and differentiation (CT1, 12, and 17). Induction with calcium chloride (Ca(2+)) resulted in morphological changes characteristic of keratinocyte differentiation. Combined multi-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and computational image analysis on the undifferentiated (0 h) and differentiated (24 h after Ca(2+) treatment) HEK revealed that (a) increases in CT volumes correspond to overall nuclear volume increases, (b) radial positioning is gene density-dependent at 0 h but neither gene density- nor size-dependent at 24 h, (c) the average number of interchromosomal associations for each CT is gene density-dependent and similar at both time points, and (d) there are striking differences in the single and multiple pairwise interchromosomal association profiles. Probabilistic network models of the overall interchromosomal associations demonstrate major reorganization of the network during differentiation. Only ~40 % of the CT pairwise connections in the networks are common to both 0 and 24 h HEK. We propose that there is a probabilistic chromosome positional code which can be significantly altered during cell differentiation in coordination with reprogramming of gene expression.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell DifferentiationChromosomes, HumanEpidermal CellsEpidermisHumansKeratinocytes3D FISHChromosome territoriesComputational image analysisInterchromosomal networks (ICNs)Keratinocyte differentiation

Identifiers

PMID26490167
OpenAlexW1866708842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.