Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26490099›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Does smoking cessation result in improved mental health? A comparison of regression modelling and propensity score matching.

Gemma Taylor, Alan Girling, Ann McNeill, Paul Aveyard

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Smoking cessation for improving mental health.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma TaylorSchool of Health & Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Birmingham, UK.
Alan GirlingSchool of Health & Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ann McNeillUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Birmingham, UK Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Paul AveyardUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Birmingham, UK Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSmokers report that smoking is therapeutic; a recent meta-analysis suggests the contrary. However, the association in that review may be explained by group-membership bias and confounding. Propensity score matching (PSM) aims to produce causal estimates from observational data. We examined the association between cessation and change in mental health before and after PSM.

designA secondary analysis of prospective data from 5 placebo-controlled randomised trials for smoking reduction.

participantsAll participants were adult smokers and had smoked for at least 3 years. Participants were excluded if they were pregnant, breast feeding, under psychiatric care, deemed to be unfit by a general practitioner or part of a cessation programme. In total, 937 participants provided smoking data at both 6-month and 12-month follow-ups. Of these, 68 were confirmed as abstinent at both 6 and 12 months and 589 as continuous smokers at both follow-ups. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Change in mental health (36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), scored 0-100) from baseline (while all participants were smokers) to 12-month follow-up (after cessation) was compared between quitters and continuing smokers with and without adjustment, and after PSM.

resultsBefore matching, quitters' mental health scores improved compared with continuing smokers', the mean difference and 95% CI was 5.5 (1.6 to 9.4). After adjustment, the difference was 4.5 (0.6 to 8.5), and after PSM, the difference was 3.4 (-2.2 to 8.9).

conclusionsImprovements in mental health after smoking cessation may be partly but not completely explained by group membership bias and confounding.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdultBiasFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSmokingSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesEPIDEMIOLOGYMENTAL HEALTHPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHSMOKING AND TOBACCO

Identifiers

PMID26490099
PMCPMC4620166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.