Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26489891›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2015

Prepregnancy Obesity and Primary Cesareans among Otherwise Low-Risk Mothers in 38 U.S. States in 2012.

Eugene Declercq, Marian MacDorman, Michelle Osterman, Candice Belanoff, Ronald Iverson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eugene DeclercqDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Marian MacDormanMaryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Michelle OstermanDivision of Vital Statistics, Reproductive Statistics Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Candice BelanoffDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ronald IversonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USNational Center for Health Statistics · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PHS HHS R40MC17172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United States has recently experienced increases in both its rate of obesity and its cesarean rate. Our objective was to use a new item measuring prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) on the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth to examine at a population level the relationship between maternal obesity and primary cesarean delivery for women at otherwise low risk for cesarean delivery.

methodsBy 2012, 38 states with 86 percent of United States births had adopted the U.S. Standard Certificate. The sample was limited to the 2,233,144 women who had a singleton, vertex, term (37-41 weeks) birth in 2012 and no prior cesarean. We modeled the likelihood of a primary cesarean by BMI category, controlling for maternal socio-demographic and medical characteristics.

resultsOverall, 46.4 percent of otherwise low-risk mothers had a prepregnancy BMI in the overweight (25.1%) or obese (21.3%) categories, with the obese category distributed as follows: obese I (BMI 30.0-34.9, 12.4%); obese II (BMI 35.0-39.9, 5.5%); and obese III (BMI 40+, 3.5%). Obesity rates were highest among American Indian and Alaska Native (32.5%) and non-Hispanic black mothers (30.5%). After adjustment for demographic and medical risks, the adjusted risk ratios (95% confidence intervals) of cesarean for low-risk primiparas were: 1.61 (1.60-1.63) for obese I, 1.86 (1.83-1.88) for obese II, and 2.21 (2.18-2.25) for obese III mothers compared with mothers in the normal weight category. DISCUSSION: A relationship between prepregnancy obesity and primary cesarean delivery among relatively low-risk mothers remained even after controlling for social and medical risk factors.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionObesityPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansLikelihood FunctionsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statescesarean deliveryobesityprepregnancy obesity

Identifiers

PMID26489891
PMCPMC4750476
OpenAlexW2166080375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.