Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26489862›Full record

ArticlemBio2015

Nonreplicating influenza A virus vaccines confer broad protection against lethal challenge.

Mariana Baz, Kobporn Boonnak, Myeisha Paskel, Celia Santos, Timothy Powell, Alain Townsend, Kanta Subbarao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Intranasal Delivery ofVaccines · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana BazLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kobporn BoonnakLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Myeisha PaskelLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Celia SantosLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Timothy PowellMolecular Immunology Group, Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alain TownsendMolecular Immunology Group, Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kanta SubbaraoLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA ksubbarao@niaid.nih.gov.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMRC Human Immunology Unit · GBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Preclinical Studies of Vaccines for Pandemic InfluenzaZIAAI000933 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2009 to 2017
$13.7M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledNew vaccine technologies are being investigated for their ability to elicit broadly cross-protective immunity against a range of influenza viruses. We compared the efficacies of two intranasally delivered nonreplicating influenza virus vaccines (H1 and H5 S-FLU) that are based on the suppression of the hemagglutinin signal sequence, with the corresponding H1N1 and H5N1 cold-adapted (ca) live attenuated influenza virus vaccines in mice and ferrets. Administration of two doses of H1 or H5 S-FLU vaccines protected mice and ferrets from lethal challenge with homologous, heterologous, and heterosubtypic influenza viruses, and two doses of S-FLU and ca vaccines yielded comparable effects. Importantly, when ferrets immunized with one dose of H1 S-FLU or ca vaccine were challenged with the homologous H1N1 virus, the challenge virus failed to transmit to naive ferrets by the airborne route. S-FLU technology can be rapidly applied to any emerging influenza virus, and the promising preclinical data support further evaluation in humans. IMPORTANCE: Influenza viruses continue to represent a global public health threat, and cross-protective vaccines are needed to prevent seasonal and pandemic influenza. Currently licensed influenza vaccines are based on immunity to the hemagglutinin protein that is highly variable. However, T cell responses directed against highly conserved viral proteins contribute to clearance of the virus and confer broadly cross-reactive and protective immune responses against a range of influenza viruses. In this study, two nonreplicating pseudotyped influenza virus vaccines were compared with their corresponding live attenuated influenza virus vaccines, and both elicited robust protection against homologous and heterosubtypic challenge in mice and ferrets, making them promising candidates for further evaluation in humans.

Indexed as

Cross ProtectionAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFerretsImmunization ScheduleInfluenza A virusInfluenza VaccinesMiceOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSurvival AnalysisVaccines, AttenuatedInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID26489862
PMCPMC4620468
OpenAlexW2175077424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.