Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26489080›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Adolescent Heavy Drinking Does Not Affect Maturation of Basic Executive Functioning: Longitudinal Findings from the TRAILS Study.

Sarai R Boelema, Zeena Harakeh, Martine J E van Zandvoort, Sijmen A Reijneveld, Frank C Verhulst, Johan Ormel, Wilma A M Vollebergh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alcohol and Cannabis Use and the Developing Brain.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effect of alcohol use on the adolescent brain and behavior.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarai R BoelemaFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Zeena HarakehFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martine J E van ZandvoortExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank C VerhulstDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan OrmelInterdisciplinary Centre for Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wilma A M VolleberghFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsExcessive alcohol use is assumed to affect maturation of cognitive functioning in adolescence. However, most existing studies that have tested this hypothesis are seriously flawed due to the use of selective groups and/or cross-sectional designs, which limits the ability to draw firm conclusions. This longitudinal study investigated whether patterns of alcohol use predicted differences in maturation of executive functioning in adolescence. Additionally, gender was tested as a possible moderator.

methodsWe used data from the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS), which comprises a cohort of 2,230 Dutch adolescents. Maturation of executive functioning was measured by assessing the standardized improvement on each of four basic executive functions (i.e., inhibition, working memory, and shift- and sustained attention) between ages 11 and 19. Participants were assigned to one of six (heavy) drinking groups (i.e., non-drinkers, light drinkers, infrequent heavy drinkers, increased heavy drinkers, decreased heavy drinkers, and chronic heavy drinkers). We conducted linear regression analyses, and adjusted for relevant confounders.

resultsThe six drinking groups did not reveal significant differences in maturation between drinking groups. E.g., maturation executive functioning of chronic heavy drinkers in comparison to non-drinkers; inhibition: B = -0.14, 95% CI [-0.41 to 0.14], working memory: B = -0.03, 95% CI [-0.26 to 0.21], shift attention: B = 0.13, 95% CI [-0.17 to 0.41], sustained attention: B = 0.12, 95% CI [-0.60 to 0.36]. Furthermore, gender was not found to be a significant moderator.

conclusionsFour years of weekly heavy drinking (i.e., chronic heavy drinkers) did not result in measurable impairments in four basic executive functions. Thus, regular heavy drinking in adolescence does not seem to affect these basic behavioural measures of executive functioning.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesUnderage DrinkingAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAttentionCross-Sectional StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMemory, Short-TermMultivariate AnalysisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26489080
PMCPMC4619383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.