Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26489023›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Prognostic Value of the Six-Second Spirometry in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cohort Study.

Eva Prats, Elena Tejero, Paloma Pardo, Adelaida Gavilán, Raúl Galera, José Ramón Donado, Miguel Ángel Racionero, Raquel Casitas, Antonio Zapatero, Francisco García-Río

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal Club-Respiratory Impairment With A Preserved Spirometric Ratio.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Validity of the Handheld Expiratory Flowmeter for COPD Screening in the Primary Care Setting of China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Article
  4. Early diagnosis of COPD: myth or a true perspective.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eva PratsUnidad de Neumología. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Elena TejeroServicio de Urgencias. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Paloma PardoServicio de Urgencias. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Adelaida GavilánServicio de Urgencias. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Raúl GaleraServicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
José Ramón DonadoUnidad de Neumología. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel RacioneroUnidad de Neumología. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel CasitasServicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
Antonio ZapateroServicio de Medicina Interna. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco García-RíoServicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe six-second spirometry has been proposed as an alternative to diagnose airflow limitation, although its prognostic value in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of the postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV6) ratio and FEV6 in COPD patients. METHODS AND

findingsThe study population consisted of 2,614 consecutive stable patients with COPD. The patients were monitored for an average period of 4.3 years regarding mortality, hospitalizations by COPD exacerbations, diagnosis of lung cancer, and annual lung function decline. The overall rate of death was 10.7 (95%CI: 8.7-12.7) per 1000 person-years. In addition to male gender, age and comorbidity, FEV6 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.981, 95%CI: 0.968-0.003) and FEV1/FEV6 quartiles (lowest quartile (<74% pred.): HR 3.558, 95%CI: 1.752-7.224; and second quartile (74-84% pred.): HR 2.599, 95%CI: 1.215-5.561; versus best quartile (>0.89% pred.)) were independently associated with mortality, whereas FEV1 was not retained in the model. 809 patients (30.9%) had at least one hospital admission due to COPD exacerbation. In addition to sex, age, smoking and comorbidity, FEV1 and FEV1/FEV6 quartiles were independent risk factors of hospitalization. FEV6 was the only spirometric parameter independently related with lung function annual decline, while the FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 quartiles were independent risk factors for lung cancer.

conclusionsIn a general COPD outpatient population, airflow obstruction assessed by the FEV1/FEV6 is an independent risk factor for both death and hospitalization.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsSpirometryVital Capacity

Identifiers

PMID26489023
PMCPMC4619273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.