Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26488842›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2015

Working Toward Normalcy Post-Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Older Adult Breast and Prostate Cancer Survivors.

Rachel Walker, Sarah L Szanton, Jennifer Wenzel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health-related quality of life in long-term Caribbean prostate cancer survivors: comparisons with prostate cancer-free men.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Age-specific health-related quality of life in disease-free long-term prostate cancer survivors versus male population controls-results from a population-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel WalkerUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst.
Sarah L SzantonJohns Hopkins University.
Jennifer WenzelJohns Hopkins University.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesTo develop a better understanding of how older adult survivors of early-stage breast and prostate cancer managed the work of recovery.
. RESEARCH APPROACH: Multiple case study design embedded in a larger randomized, controlled trial of a nurse-led patient navigation intervention. 
.

settingCommunity-based research conducted via in-home visits and by phone with participants residing in non-metropolitan areas of a mid-Atlantic state.

participantsRural-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older with early-stage breast or prostate cancer and the people who support them (11 dyads). METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: An approach to grounded theory analysis was used to evaluate the fit between existing theoretical knowledge and case findings and to generate new knowledge about the cancer recovery process.

findingsWorking toward normalcy was a core process of cancer recovery prompted by participants' internal experiences and external interactions with their environments. This ongoing, iterative, and active process involved multiple concurrent strategies that were not necessarily medically oriented or cancer specific. Working toward normalcy resulted in movement along a continuum of self-appraisal anchored between participants experiencing life as completely disrupted by cancer to a life back to normal. A greater sense of normalcy was associated with higher engagement in valued activities and increased physical and psychological well-being.

conclusionsIn addition to the core process of working toward normalcy, multiple theories from nursing, sociology, psychology, and gerontology helped to explain case findings. This knowledge could serve as a foundation on which to design survivorship care that supports the goals of cancer survivors working toward normalcy post-treatment.

interpretationPost-treatment wellness goals can include a desire to reestablish or maintain a sense of normalcy. Nursing actions that promote survivors' efforts to be perceived as capable, stay engaged in valued activities and roles, maintain a sense of control over their lives and bodies, and make plans for the future may help meet this goal. Existing theories about identity, dignity, inner strength, and the work of illness can inform nursing interventions.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchSurvivorsgrounded theoryneoplasmsnormalcyoncology nursingrural populationsurvivors

Identifiers

PMID26488842
PMCPMC4750471
OpenAlexW2267011305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.