Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26488653›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Effect of the N-Terminal Helix and Nucleotide Loading on the Membrane and Effector Binding of Arl2/3.

Shobhna Kapoor, Eyad K Fansa, Simone Möbitz, Shehab A Ismail, Roland Winter, Alfred Wittinghofer, Katrin Weise

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of the smallbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shobhna KapoorPhysical Chemistry I - Biophysical Chemistry, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Chemical Biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.
Eyad K FansaStructural Biology Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.
Simone MöbitzPhysical Chemistry I - Biophysical Chemistry, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Shehab A IsmailStructural Biology Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany; Structural Biology of Cilia, CR-UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Roland WinterPhysical Chemistry I - Biophysical Chemistry, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Alfred WittinghoferStructural Biology Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany. Electronic address: alfred.wittinghofer@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.
Katrin WeisePhysical Chemistry I - Biophysical Chemistry, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany. Electronic address: katrin.weise@tu-dortmund.de.
TU Dortmund University · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology · DECancer Research UK Scotland Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small GTP-binding proteins Arl2 and Arl3, which are close homologs, share a number of interacting partners and act as displacement factors for prenylated and myristoylated cargo. Nevertheless, both proteins have distinct biological functions. Whereas Arl3 is considered a ciliary protein, Arl2 has been reported to be involved in tubulin folding, mitochondrial function, and Ras signaling. How these different roles are attained by the two homolog proteins is not fully understood. Recently, we showed that the N-terminal amphipathic helix of Arl3, but not that of Arl2, regulates the release of myristoylated ciliary proteins from the GDI-like solubilizing factor UNC119a/b. In the biophysical study presented here, both proteins are shown to exhibit a preferential localization and clustering in liquid-disordered domains of phase-separated membranes. However, the membrane interaction behavior differs significantly between both proteins with regard to their nucleotide loading. Whereas Arl3 and other Arf proteins with an N-terminal amphipathic helix require GTP loading for the interaction with membranes, Arl2 binds to membranes in a nucleotide-independent manner. In contrast to Arl2, the N-terminal helix of Arl3 increases the binding affinity to UNC119a. Furthermore, UNC119a impedes membrane binding of Arl3, but not of Arl2. Taken together, these results suggest an interplay among the nucleotide status of Arl3, the location of the N-terminal helix, membrane fluidity and binding, and the release of lipid modified cargos from carriers such as UNC119a. Since a specific Arl3-GEF is postulated to reside inside cilia, the N-terminal helix of Arl3•GTP would be available for allosteric regulation of UNC119a cargo release only inside cilia.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingFluorescenceGTP-Binding ProteinsGuanosine DiphosphateKineticsMembrane MicrodomainsMembranes, ArtificialMicroscopy, Atomic ForceOptical ImagingProtein ConformationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingGTP-Binding ProteinsGuanosine DiphosphateMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID26488653
PMCPMC4624342
OpenAlexW1785108077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.