ArticleBiophysical journal2015
Discrimination of Kinetic Models by a Combination of Microirradiation and Fluorescence Photobleaching.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Methodologies to Study DNA Repair Processes in Space and Time Within Living Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- In Situ Analysis of DNA-Protein Complex Formation upon Radiation-Induced DNA Damage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Systematic analysis of DNA damage induction and DNA repair pathway activation by continuous wave visible light laser micro-irradiation.AIMS genetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is an excellent tool to measure the chemical rate constants of fluorescently labeled proteins in living cells. Usually FRAP experiments are conducted with the protein concentrations being in a steady state, i.e., when the association and dissociation of the proteins are equilibrated. This is a strong limitation because situations in which rate constants change with time are of great scientific interest. In this study, we present an approach in which FRAP is used shortly after DNA damage introducing laser microirradiation, which results in the recruitment of the DNA clamp protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) to DNA lesions. We establish different kinetic models that are compatible with the observed PCNA recruitment data if FRAP is not used. By using FRAP at different time points during protein accumulation, we can not only exclude two out of three models, but we can also determine the rate constants with increased reliability. This study thus demonstrates the feasibility of using FRAP during protein recruitment and its application in the discrimination of possible kinetic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.